Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:15:25 +0100
with message-id <20131124101525.ga8...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#719904: UDD: Add "Java" bug type to filter pkg-java /
openjdk bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #719904,
regarding UDD: Add "Java" bug type to filter pkg-java /
Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2013 11:22:51 +0100
with message-id <20131124102251.ga8...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#704415: Merge
http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/Hacking and
http://udd.debian.org/hacking.html [DONE]
has caused the Debian Bug report #704415,
regardin
Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:02:57 +0100
with message-id <20131124110257.ga9...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#728837: UDD: bugs.cgi: excluding bugs that are fixed
in experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #728837,
regarding UDD: bugs.cgi: excluding bugs that are fixed
On 29/08/13 at 13:47 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> It would be useful to have the option to display maintainer and
> uploaders on bugs.cgi. Being able to search for yourself in the bugs
> list would also be useful.
On 02/10/13 at 14:08 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> It would be great if one could downl
On 04/10/13 at 15:23 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-10-04 08:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Package: qa.debian.org
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are a number of cases where the Debian Bug Tracker can become
> > "confused" or (to many) behave surprisingly. The most common
On 2013-11-24 12:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 04/10/13 at 15:23 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> On 2013-10-04 08:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> There are a number of cases where the Debian Bug Tracker can become
>>> "confused" or (to many) behave surprisingly. The most common example
>>> is when a
Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:15:24 +0100
with message-id <20131124131524.ga12...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#725321: [UDD]: Please make a "BTS might be confused"
script/query
has caused the Debian Bug report #725321,
regarding [UDD]: Please make a "BTS might be confused" s
On 2013-11-24 12:02, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/11/13 at 04:47 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> it would be helpful to have a way to exclude bugs that are fixed in
>> experimental (derived from version information, not the ancient
> I've fixed this in a slightly different way. I've affected a
On 2013-11-24 12:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 2013-10-04 08:43, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> There are a number of cases where the Debian Bug Tracker can become
>>> "confused" or (to many) behave surprisingly. The most common example
>>> is when a bug in marked as "found" and "fixed" in the same ve
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
UDD seems be be a bit confused about some bugs, too:
query for closed bugs affecting sid (all bugs), and you will find
several kfreebsd-8 bugs there, e.g. #725575
but kfreebsd-8 has been removed from jessie and sid ...
Maybe the sid and jessie tags add
10 matches
Mail list logo
