Re: r3013 - in /trunk/pts: apache.conf www/cgi-bin/pts.cgi www/web/common/index.html www/web/common/pts.js www/xsl/pts.xsl

2013-05-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Strictly speaking, uppercases are also forbidden (at least by dpkg) and > the first character may not be anything else than alphanumeric: Indeed. I plan to add some lowercasing. I'll fix the first-character thing at the same time. > Also,

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-05-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:06:14PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > IN fact I'm considering a not yet used update mechanism in UDD - perhaps > > some commit hook or so which sounds more apropriate in the Blends > > metapackage case. A daily import (as usual in UDD) does not make much > > sens

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-05-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Sounds quite interesting. http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/StudentApplications/SimonChopin http://lists.debian.org/20130425115056.21764.39271@mithrandir > I have introduced a 'title' field. Please check again > > > http://anonscm

Bug#702073: PTS should not display patches for fixed bugs neither

2013-05-27 Thread Holger Levsen
control: retitle -1 PTS should not display patches for fixed nor blocked bugs Hi, for example, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=munin&include=tags:patch&exclude=tags:pending&pend-exc=done&repeatmerged=no displayed by http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/munin.html is pretty useless,

Processed: PTS should not display patches for fixed bugs neither

2013-05-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 PTS should not display patches for fixed nor blocked bugs Bug #702073 [qa.debian.org] PTS: should not suggest to process patches on blocked bugs Changed Bug title to 'PTS should not display patches for fixed nor blocked bugs' from 'PTS: should not sugges

Re: PTS: revamp style

2013-05-27 Thread David Suárez
Hi, On Lunes, 27 de mayo de 2013 06:57:59 Paul Wise escribió: > Unfortunately both of these URLs just give me some PHP errors. Could > you attach a patch or new CSS file instead? Done. Thanks, David Index: www/web/common/revamp.css ===

Re: PTS: revamp style

2013-05-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:12:04PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > On Lunes, 27 de mayo de 2013 06:57:59 Paul Wise escribió: > > Unfortunately both of these URLs just give me some PHP errors. Could > > you attach a patch or new CSS file instead? > > Done. Hey David, thanks for your proposed changes.

Re: PTS: revamp style

2013-05-27 Thread David Suárez
Hi, Alternate version with the subscription box at the page header, like bug #704102 suggests: http://awesomescreenshot.com/0281bp59b6 Thanks, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org A

Re: PTS: revamp style

2013-05-27 Thread David Suárez
On Lunes, 27 de mayo de 2013 18:19:16 Stefano Zacchiroli escribió: > I've some comments about this. Personally, I think your example uses > bold typefaces way too much. Bold typefaces should be used sparingly, to > highlight important stuff, not as a de facto default to typeset all the > informativ

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-05-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:11:52PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Sounds quite interesting. > > http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013/StudentApplications/SimonChopin > http://lists.debian.org/20130425115056.21764.39271@mithrandir Cool. > > I have introduced a 'title' field. Please chec

Re: PTS: revamp style

2013-05-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:12 AM, David Suárez wrote: > Done. Those of you who want to take a look at the result in your browser can compare it here: http://packages.qa.debian.org/~pabs/n/nsis.html http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nsis.html My thoughts: You added a significant amount of whitesp

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-05-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I'm not fully convince about the numbered tasks. Failing to be able to > make a better suggestion I'd be fine if this would be implemented but > perhaps somebody else might have a better idea. ... > No problem for the moment. I'm not sure i