[udd] [PATCH] Fix references to old Ubuntu releases

2012-09-16 Thread Paul Wise
--- web/bugs.cgi|2 +- web/cgi-bin/attic/sources_in_ubuntu_but_not_in_debian_by_popcon.cgi |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/web/bugs.cgi b/web/bugs.cgi index c136b3d..82097b7 100755 --- a/web/bugs.

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > My patch does not seem to have been committed to the SVN repository, > could someone do that please? Apparently I need an ack on my patch to devref about the procedures needed when re-introducing packages. I would appreciate it if someone from

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:38:51PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 19:53 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > My patch does not seem to have been committed to the SVN repository, > > could someone do that please? > > Apparently I need an ack on my patch to devref about the procedures > n

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 08:38:51PM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > > Apparently I need an ack on my patch to devref about the procedures > needed when re-introducing packages. I would appreciate it if someone > from the debian-qa list (CCed) could take a look at the patch and > suggest if the patch n

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 13:28 +, Bart Martens wrote: > I'm looking at this now. I agree with most of your patch. I'm having doubts > on this paragraph : ... > I suggest to replace the paragraph quoted above by these two paragraphs : Done in the attached patch, thanks. Based on feedback from

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 08:51 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Done in the attached patch, thanks. I didn't see the comments from Charles Plessy as I wasn't subscribed to the bug and he did not CC me. I've attached a new version adopting his suggestions. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise Ind

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 09:16:32AM +0800, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 08:51 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > Done in the attached patch, thanks. > > I didn't see the comments from Charles Plessy as I wasn't subscribed to > the bug and he did not CC me. I've attached a new version ado

Re: Bug#685039: developers-reference: please document what is needed to reintroduce a package

2012-09-16 Thread David Prévot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, Le 16/09/2012 21:16, Paul Wise a écrit : > > -Moving, removing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning packages > +Moving, removing, reintroducing, renaming, adopting, and orphaning > packages > I guess “reintroducing” should be the last item o