Bug#685605: qa.debian.org: Would be great if the PTS could provide RDF descriptions of packages

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi. There exist a few specification addressing the need of standardization of RDF descriptions for Software Packages, like SPDX [0] or ADMS.SW [1]. I guess it would be great if the PTS could export on the Linked Open Data graph / Semantic Web, descript

Bug#585740: qa.debian.org: Would be great if the PTS could provide RDFa metadata

On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 06:42:47PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > > > Maybe this ontology : > > http://github.com/nbarrientos/steamy/blob/master/ontologies/debian.owl > > could be a good candidate for representing package metada

Bug#585740: qa.debian.org: Would be great if the PTS could provide RDFa metadata

On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > > Along the lines described in http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/rdfa-pts, it > would be great if the PTS provided RDFa metadata. > Btw, there could be interest for other flavours of RDF, so I've just filed a wishlist in the mo

Adding ADMS.SW RDF descriptions of source packages to the PTS

Hi. I've started working on #685605, i.e. adding some RDF+XML documents generated for the PTS static pages. Appologies for those not Semantic Web aware in advance ;-) I hope the code and following example can help illustrate my goal, still, beyond the jargon. I've committed a first admssw.xsl st