Hi,
at
svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/saint/trunk/
I did some preparation for a new package. It needs a fairly simple
patch for the Makefile (just s/rm/rm -f/). When I try to build the
package with the debian/ dir from SVN with an *unchanged* tarball
which does contain *two*
On 04/26/12 18:13, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes:
>
>> I'm with pabs about integrating it to qa.d.o, sounds really helpful :)
>> Btw, I've just checked a few links reported as error 500 and some seem
>> to not present any problem. See:
>
>> http://sdl.perl.org/
>> http://www.
Andreas Tille writes:
> at
>svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/saint/trunk/
> I did some preparation for a new package. It needs a fairly simple
> patch for the Makefile (just s/rm/rm -f/). When I try to build the
> package with the debian/ dir from SVN with an *unchanged* tar
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:37:57AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > dpkg-source: info: using source format `3.0 (quilt)'
> > dpkg-source: info: building saint using existing ./saint_2.3.3.orig.tar.gz
> > can't find file to patch at input line 3
> > Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> >
Andreas Tille writes:
> $ quilt push
> Applying patch fix-makefile.patch
> can't find file to patch at input line 3
> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> The text leading up to this was:
> --
> |--- a/SAINT_v2.3.3/Makefile
> |+++ b/SAINT_v2.3.3/Makefile
> --
Le Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:47:06PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> saint-2.3.3/__MACOSX
>
> You don't need to repackage; you would just need to stop treating
> SAINT_v2.3.3 as if it were the top level of the upstream tarball, since
> dpkg-source doesn't agree with that. If you make the deb
6 matches
Mail list logo
