Package: qa.debian.org
I’ve sponsored an upload of mediawiki for the second time now,
and it still doesn’t show up at:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login...@mirbsd.de
Note mediawiki-extensions is not sponsored but indeed uploaded
by me, but mediawiki isn’t.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:52:55PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Along the lines described in http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/rdfa-pts, it
> would be great if the PTS provided RDFa metadata.
>
> I think it lacks just a few modifications in order to provide proper RDFa in
> the XH
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:31:55AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> It would be great if bug lists or bug pages could include RDFa content.
>
> Such content could be basic bug description.
>
For an example of what kind of RDF metadata could be obtained for Debian bugs,
here's a server
Hi
FYI, here's the return of our tool to do some UDD facts export as RDF.
Here's a server we have setup, which provides some RDF descriptions of
bugs out of what is contained in the UDD database :
http://testforge.int-evry.fr/d2r-server/
This is work in progress and not meant for end-users. For
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Olivier Berger wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:31:55AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > It would be great if bug lists or bug pages could include RDFa
> > content.
> >
> > Such content could be basic bug description.
>
> For an example of what kind of RDF metadata could b
Le vendredi 30 juillet 2010 à 17:06 -0400, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:31:55AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > > It would be great if bug lists or bug pages could include RDFa
> > > content.
> > >
> > > Such content could be
6 matches
Mail list logo