Bug#566637: DDPO stops showing packages in other suites but not in unstable

2010-01-24 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: ddpo Hello, now DDPO doesn't show packages that are still in other suites but were removed from unstable. For a couple of examples: my DDPO: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=morph package in stabl

Serious licensing issues in isdnutils

2010-01-24 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi Maintainers, unfortunately the package isdnutils is in a very bad shape and not distributable right now (see #559425 for details). The package is orphaned since several months and should be removed if nobody starts to take care of it soon. As one of you packages (build-)depends on it, you might

Bug#538440: marked as done (qa.debian.org: non-ascii characters in uploader name are displayed incorrectly)

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:35:10 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2336 has caused the Debian Bug report #538440, regarding qa.debian.org: non-ascii characters in uploader name are displayed incorrectly to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#535487: marked as done (DDPO: Debian Maintainer's uploads show wrongly show uploader in tooltip)

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:06:46 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2337 has caused the Debian Bug report #535487, regarding DDPO: Debian Maintainer's uploads show wrongly show uploader in tooltip to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#545428: marked as done (PTS: "bugs count" is incorrect English)

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:25:03 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2338 has caused the Debian Bug report #545428, regarding PTS: "bugs count" is incorrect English to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Processed: Re: Bug#494557: ftp.debian.org: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 494557 normal Bug #494557 [qa.debian.org] PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > tags 494557 moreinfo Bug #494557 [qa.debian.org] PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package no

Bug#494557: marked as done (PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail)

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:37:58 +0100 with message-id <20100124153758.ga16...@df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#494557: ftp.debian.org: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug mail has caused the Debian Bug report #494557, regarding PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package no

Processed: Re: Bug#556217: DDPO does not show sponsored uploads

2010-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 556217 moreinfo Bug #556217 [qa.debian.org] DDPO does not show sponsored uploads Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, De

Bug#556217: DDPO does not show sponsored uploads

2010-01-24 Thread Christoph Berg
tags 556217 moreinfo thanks Re: Ludovic Brenta 2009-11-14 <87zl6ps3ld@ludovic-brenta.org> > One of my packages has been adopted by a new maintainer and I am the > sponsor. [...] > FWIW, both packages that expose the problem (gnade and polyorb) are > still in the NEW queue. Did you mean the pr