Re: [Piuparts-devel] Unclear failure for asclock (left over files in /var)

2009-11-29 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:04:30PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 10:22:40 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 25. November 2009, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > Package purging left files on system: > > > /var/cache/man/pt not owned > > > /var/cache/man/pt/cat1

RFC: organising focused BSPs

2009-11-29 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, First a bit of background: I spent yesterday going through bugs filed against the xserver-xorg package (some of them had no reply since their submission 3 years ago), closed a bunch, and then looked at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=debia...@lists.debian.org which still lis

Re: RFC: organising focused BSPs

2009-11-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Julien Cristau, le Sun 29 Nov 2009 12:43:48 +0100, a écrit : > So one thing I think might help would be to organise some sort of > focused BSPs where you pick a weekend, a set of packages (say X, or > gnome, or mozilla, …), and 20 or so people, and you try to triage / > answer / close as ma

Re: [fwd] RFC: organising focused BSPs

2009-11-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Julien, Julien Cristau wrote: > I've sent the attached mail to debian-qa, and would be interested to > have the opinion of maintainers of other big (sets of) packages. [ mail about focused BSPs ] I think that's a great idea! If they were done I'd try to participate, and if done in GNOME packa

Re: RFC: organising focused BSPs

2009-11-29 Thread Paul Wise
I consider this to be an absolutely excellent idea. We in the Debian Games team considered a similar concept: http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Parties Absolutely the main point of these is to get more/new people involved (especially those not yet involved in Debian), *not* to get stuff done. Getting