Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)

2009-10-26 Thread Charles Plessy
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:30:06AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > First of all, let's summarise the situation. We want to integrate some > > metadata > > in our 'web sentinels', like > > 'http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/tasks/bio'. Dear Andreas and Olivier, thank you for your encouragin

Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)

2009-10-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:49:10AM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > BTW, I'm a bit concerned about mixing different database formats: On one > hand you are using yaml on the other hand BibTeX. Well, for sure having > a BibTeX record is very valuable. But on the other hand the tools who > are w

Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)

2009-10-26 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:05:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > For the moment, one has to access an arbitrary key, but later the best would > be > to have a special key, for instance YAML-UPDATE, that would force the update. Or rather "upstream-metadata update". You certainly would not like t

Re: Gathering package upstream meta-data in the UDD. (was: Re: more formally indicating the registration URL)

2009-10-26 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:00:48AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > since BibTeX issues are perhaps a bit specialised for debian-qa, I propose to > transfer this part of the discussion on debian-scie...@l.d.o, where I reopened > an old thread. Well, the question is not really about BibTeX or not. T