> AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-19]
AT> Considering the facts presented above asking people for sending
AT> patches is a bit weak arguing (well not even so weak as the
AT> packaging work where we can not see a visible sign in the changelog
AT> since two years).
Dear Andreas,
actually I am not
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" wrote:
> The package is comaintained, and qualified people are always welcome
> (Frank Küster being the most prominent, looking to past history).
One who has not much time to spend ATM, though. And I must admit that
your packaging style is a hindrance, too: It was a very
Hi Mike and all,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright files" on
> debian-devel to understand why.
>
This is now 5 months old and (no surprisingly) nobody adopted ice
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:22:17AM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
> actually I am not presenting any argument.
Your arguing actually was:
... you can start by studying how the software
is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
as a response to a patch which was provi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:43:57AM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I've just received a complain about [1] where what it seems, at first sight, a
> TOC, infact it is not: it's a series of links to aggregated WNPP bugs but not
> a
> TOC fot the given web pages.
>
> [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp
> AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-20]
AT> Your arguing actually was:
DGMS> ... you can start by studying how the software
DGMS> is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
AT> as a response to a patch which was provided inside #539749. I'd
AT> call this weak arguing (at best)
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
>
> Hi Mike and all,
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright files" on
> > debian-devel to unde
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike and all,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > Package: wnpp
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > See the great thread a
On 20/08/09 at 19:45 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike and all,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > Package: w
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" wrote:
>> AT == Andreas Tille [2009-8-20]
>
> AT> Your arguing actually was:
>
> DGMS> ... you can start by studying how the software
> DGMS> is packaged and of course you are welcome to send in patches.
>
> AT> as a response to a patch which was provided inside #5397
Andreas Tille wrote:
> patches myself and build local packages if I want to use recent
> high popcon software like Emacs 23 who are not even be able to say
> sorry for not beeing active to potential helpers.
What I was considering myself (years ago) was to create a package
"auctex-snapshot" from
11 matches
Mail list logo
