Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 15:16 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Olivier Berger (11/05/2009):
> > Hi.
>
> o<
>
> > Is there any docs about the "Debian qa sf redirector" that can be used
> > in debian/watch (apart from man uscan) ?
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to state which "package" must be se
Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 12:33 +, Bart Martens a écrit :
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:04:33PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is there any docs about the "Debian qa sf redirector" that can be used
> > in debian/watch (apart from man uscan) ?
>
> Not that I know of. DD's can read t
Olivier Berger (12/05/2009):
> Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 12:33 +, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > Not that I know of. DD's can read the source code.
>
> And non-DDs ? ... something available somewhere in SVN on alioth by any
> chance ?
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/qa/trunk/wml/watch/
Mraw,
KiBi.
Le mardi 12 mai 2009 à 11:48 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Olivier Berger (12/05/2009):
> > Le lundi 11 mai 2009 à 12:33 +, Bart Martens a écrit :
> > > Not that I know of. DD's can read the source code.
> >
> > And non-DDs ? ... something available somewhere in SVN on alioth by any
> >
Package: pulseaudio
Version: 0.9.15-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Said pulseaudio-package doesn't enforce the installation of a package
with libpulsecommon-0.9.15.so in it, so now executing pulseaudio just
delivers following message:
pulseaudio: error while load
[Mailing you a copy, hope that's ok]
Olivier Berger wrote:
[...]
>
> As I understand it, the redirector doesn't use the web pages and goes
> directly checking the download areas... so no way to detect such
> "package" filtering ? :-(
No, there isn't, unless sourceforge decides to make that infor
[Oh, just noticed you did read a message without being CC'ed]
Olivier Berger wrote:
[...]
>
> I've just added a little bit of docs pointing to it in :
> http://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch
>
Not sure pointing to the redirector's code is a good idea, it's
implementation may change at any time wi
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I type the requested URL, say for example
>
> http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/docbook-xsl
>
> Then an Internal Server Error is reported and the page
> itself shows:
>
> "No mirror could satisfy the request. Please report this
> message to debi
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Daniel Leidert wrote:
[sf.net redirector broken]
> Being curious, why did you access the redirector directly and not via
> uscan?
I found the problem, because PET currently fails on watch files
with sf.net URLs. See for example here ("DownloadError"):
http://debichem.al
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:26:54PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [Mailing you a copy, hope that's ok]
>
> Olivier Berger wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > As I understand it, the redirector doesn't use the web pages and goes
> > directly checking the download areas... so no way to detect such
> > "packag
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:47:58PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I type the requested URL, say for example
> >
> > http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/docbook-xsl
> >
> > Then an Internal Server Error is reported and the page
> > its
[don't CC me, thanks]
Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:26:54PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> It is possible with group_id=...&package_id=... without using the
> redirector.
[...]
> I don't think we need additional info from sourceforge ; the approach with
> group_id=...&package
Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:47:58PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Daniel Leidert wrote:
[...]
>> > Using uscan on the command line works.
>>
>> Only if it is from devscripts 2.10.31 or greater (lenny was released
>> with .35), which is smarter when redirected (required by
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Daniel Leidert wrote:
>
> [sf.net redirector broken]
>> Being curious, why did you access the redirector directly and not via
>> uscan?
>
> I found the problem, because PET currently fails on watch files
> with sf.net URLs. See for example here
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Raphael Geissert
wrote:
> Sure, go ahead and see your watch files fail within a month, or whenever
> sourceforge makes yet another change on their website.
> It has already happened with the ftp mirror, the website, the
> downloads.sf.net pages, now the rest of th
Paul Wise wrote:
>
> Sourceforge seems to be improving a lot lately (for example: git VCS
> option, support via IRC). I suggest that they might be open to
> providing a permanent solution to this, like direct access to an
> apache-generated index of files available for each project.
>
"Improving
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Raphael Geissert
wrote:
> "Improving" is very subjective, but I do plan to make another attempt.
I find the recent changes to be a vast improvement on the old web
interface and the old set of features.
> There was a ticket open which tried to reach an agreement
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Raphael Geissert
> wrote:
>
>> "Improving" is very subjective, but I do plan to make another attempt.
>
> I find the recent changes to be a vast improvement on the old web
> interface and the old set of features.
>
And I find some of them a
18 matches
Mail list logo
