On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Or should we rather start to just move the information of
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
into UDD for the moment and "wait".
Yeah, it would make sense to:
- add all the info from new.822 to UDD
- file a bug about exporting the other missing i
On 16/02/09 at 10:15 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>>> Or should we rather start to just move the information of
>>>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822
>>> into UDD for the moment and "wait".
>>
>> Yeah, it would make sense to:
>> - add all the info
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with what
> was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still ok with the idea of
> keeping orphaned packages out of testing? how should it be done? via
> severity:
[No CC please, thanks]
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
>
> Something like a DEP about "handling of orphaned packages". Do you want
> to start that? :-)
No offence, but DEPs sound like a lot of unneeded bureaucracy to me. A
proper RFC should cover all the needs without making it boring and too
long.
[No CC please, thank]
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with
>> what was discussed during DC8. Is the release team still ok with the idea
>> of keeping orphaned packages out o
Dear Debian QA,
I have two issues with the DDPO pages. Please let me know if these are
transient, or whether you would want me to file a bug report for them.
1. I discovered that the "More" option for binary packages under the
Buildd line in the DDPO pages seem broken; they point to the (now
miss
Hi,
On Montag, 16. Februar 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
> from the archive.
Such a hint file could also (after a while...) be autogenerated and thus
maintainance free! :)
regards,
Holger, who likes the idea
Your message dated Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:33:56 +0100
with message-id <4999e9d4.9050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#515173: rmadison: handle pg.InternalError gracefully
has caused the Debian Bug report #515173,
regarding rmadison: handle pg.InternalError gracefully
to be marked as done.
Thi
On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
> from the archive.
+1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Kumar Appaiah
wrote:
> 1. I discovered that the "More" option for binary packages under the
> Buildd line in the DDPO pages seem broken; they point to the (now
> missing) pages on ~igloo.
See #506203 (has a patch since November, the patch needs a s/jeroen/luk/ no
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> 1. I discovered that the "More" option for binary packages under the
>> Buildd line in the DDPO pages seem broken; they point to the (now
>> missing) pages on ~igloo.
>
> See #506203 (has a patch since November, the patch needs a s/jeroen/luk/ no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny3
> tags 506203 - patch
Bug#506203: qa.debian.org: Invalid link
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
from the archive.
+1
I'm struggling a little with this. Obviously I'm the first person to
want to see cruft removed and I realize we ar
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I'm struggling a little with this.
Same.
For example defoma has 113 rbdepends & 148 rdepends. Removing all of
them would likely remove all fonts from Debian. I don't think it is
acceptable to break testing this much.
Perhaps removing al
On 16/02/09 at 15:44 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [No CC please, thank]
>
> Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:23:37PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> Lenny is now out, so I think it is time to decide how to proceed with
> >> what was discussed during DC8. Is the release
On 16/02/09 at 15:31 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> [No CC please, thanks]
>
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Something like a DEP about "handling of orphaned packages". Do you want
> > to start that? :-)
>
> No offence, but DEPs sound like a lot of unneeded bureaucracy to me. A
> prope
16 matches
Mail list logo
