Link Request From Diskeeper.com

2008-11-13 Thread Joey Block
Dear Debian Webmaster, Hello, we are RetailRev, the marketing firm representing Diskeeper Corporation. As you may know, Diskeeper is one of the longest standing & strongest disk defragmentation utilities on the market today. For many years, Diskeeper has been helping IT professionals ensure

Re: УчасТие в семинаре

2008-11-13 Thread Ралия Даен
ЩГ54юПРИГЛАША ЕМ НА КУРСЫ' ПОВЫШЕНИЯ КВАЛИФИКАЦИИ СОТРУДНИКОВ И РУКОВОДИТЕЛЕЙ РУ53Г МЪ82Л20-21.11 Деятельност ь секретаря компании. КУ54Б СтоИмость участия - 14 701 ру6. ШЭ37Э Яи36М24-25.11 Практика организаци

Re: Grisbi doesn't have a maintainer anymore

2008-11-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : > Personally, I like the idea of a mailing list being listed in the > package's maintainer field for collaboratively maintained packages. I am not strongly against this. However, what do you think about: http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/FAQ#head-5b82616bf8b6417a3a5c389d3

Re: Grisbi doesn't have a maintainer anymore

2008-11-13 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : > Ordinarily, I think that the process starts by verifying whether the > maintainer is MIA. [...] Actually, the maintainer is not really MIA. He has just orphaned grisbi, at my demand. See #505570. Cheers, -- Stéphane Glondu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: Grisbi doesn't have a maintainer anymore

2008-11-13 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:11:02PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : > > Ordinarily, I think that the process starts by verifying whether the > > maintainer is MIA. [...] > > Actually, the maintainer is not really MIA. He has just orphaned grisbi, > at my demand. See #50

Re: Grisbi doesn't have a maintainer anymore

2008-11-13 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:03:13PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez a écrit : > > Personally, I like the idea of a mailing list being listed in the > > package's maintainer field for collaboratively maintained packages. > > I am not strongly against this. However, what do you thi