Re: UDD and bugs assigned to two or more packages

2008-09-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 13:10 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > (2) the way we deal with bugs affecting two (or more) packages. > That's a tricky problem. On one hand, the correct way to solve that > would be to have a separate "affected_packages" table, with (id, > package) columns, and also an "affec

[bts-link] source package qa.debian.org

2008-09-28 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package qa.debian.org # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #462470 # * https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188955 forwarded 462470 https://bugs.launchpad.net/merge-o-

Processed: [bts-link] source package qa.debian.org

2008-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package qa.debian.org > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status re

Bug#500505: DDPO: please add a "Sections" sorting order

2008-09-28 Thread David Paleino
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, since one can subscribe to packages he does not maintain via the DDPO bot, it'd be useful to patch the DDPO page, since it actually lists the subscribed packages in separate sections, but *keeps* packages in main/contrib/non-free in thei

Bug#500505: marked as done (DDPO: please add a "Sections" sorting order)

2008-09-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:21:50 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1994 has caused the Debian Bug report #500505, regarding DDPO: please add a "Sections" sorting order to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the