Your message dated Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:30:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#483179: reopen 483179, PTS: please do *not* link to
Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
has caused the Debian Bug report #483179,
regarding PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
to be m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 483179 PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
Bug#483179: PTS: please *do not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page
Changed Bug title to `PTS: please link to Ubuntu Launchpad bugs page' from
`PTS: please *do not* link to Ubuntu Launchpad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am Mo den 16. Jun 2008 um 6:25 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> esound should *so much* die completely. It has very poor sound quality
I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not th
Hi Klaus,
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 10:12 +0100]:
> I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
> ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not that good than with OSS
> direct but it is ok.)
Hm, that rather sounds like for your card the OSS driver is much
better than t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Martin,
Am Di den 17. Jun 2008 um 11:50 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 10:12 +0100]:
> > I cannot prove that. Its sound quality is much better than the one of
> > ALSA direct. (Well esd on top of OSS. It is not that good than wit
Klaus Ethgen [2008-06-17 14:06 +0100]:
> > The alternative to esound is not really ALSA, but rather pulseaudio.
>
> Is pulsaudio supported by applications like wine for example? Do
> pulsaudio work on top of OSS?
pulseaudio provides an esound ABI compatibility layer, thus it's a
drop-in replaceme
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Martin Pitt wrote:
> That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver
> instead of the ALSA one? I can really not imagine how esound on top of
> a broken ALSA driver would sound better than just using the ALSA
> output directly?
It might normalize which sa
Le mardi 17 juin 2008 à 14:06 +0100, Klaus Ethgen a écrit :
> OSS: Works well.
> OSS<-ESD: Works well too.
> ALSA: The problems above.
> ALSA<-ESD: I never really tested.
Last time I checked, libesd-alsa0 was still completely unusable (well,
except for some weird kind of sound-based torture).
--
Hi,
we have had a little trouble with our sf redirector a while back (i.e. the
sf mirror was down) and it is really annoying.
Anyhow, I noticed that there are now direct links with http 302 redirection
towards a mirror, without the ugly selection page!
example: [not wrapped at 80 columns, sorry]
I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
Downside is the extra redirects (sf->sourceforge, files->showfiles.php).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
>
> http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
>
> Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
Thanks, this avoids the group_id search, so the audacity case can be trimmed to:
ve
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:12:52AM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Mo den 16. Jun 2008 um 6:25 schrieb Martin Pitt:
very poor code quality
That might be. But that's a problem of many gnome applications.
To be quite honest, I've seen the code for esd, and it is terrible.
In fact, worse than al
Hi Filippo,
Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> we have had a little trouble with our sf redirector a while back (i.e. the
> sf mirror was down) and it is really annoying.
> Anyhow, I noticed that there are now direct links with http 302 redirection
> towards a mirror, without the ugly selection page!
Is i
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 18:24 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I found a while back that this URL redirects to the files page:
> >
> > http://sf.net/projects/foo/files
> >
> > Slightly more readable than the URL you used.
>
> Thanks,
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:44:23 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Last time I checked, libesd-alsa0 was still completely unusable (well,
> except for some weird kind of sound-based torture).
I regularly help users to find out why their sound has stopped working,
and the cause is usually due to libes
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:11:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> *dons devscripts maintainer hat*
> fwiw, if I were applying this change at the moment, it would be likely
> to be commited as per the attached.
> *removes hat*
>
> Thomas has a reasonable point though; it would be good not to break
16 matches
Mail list logo
