Re: on mass bug reassigning

2008-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 After re-reading what I wrote last night I noticed it was probably not the best way to express my POV, so I'd like to apologise. To clarify: * I have nothing against cleaning up/reassigning bugs, it's just that some things have to be prevented. * I

Processed: [bts-link] source package qa.debian.org

2008-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package qa.debian.org > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > # remote status re

[bts-link] source package qa.debian.org

2008-05-25 Thread bts-link-upstream
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package qa.debian.org # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #462470 # * https://bugs.launchpad.net/+bug/188955 forwarded 462470 https://bugs.launchpad.net/merge-o-

Re: on mass bug reassigning

2008-05-25 Thread Luk Claes
Raphael Geissert wrote: > I currently don't have enough time to write a script that gathers the > versions information from the origin package to use when MBR. But here is > what I believe needs to be done: > > * Encourage package maintainers to keep the old changelog around (e.g. > php5's chang

Re: on mass bug reassigning

2008-05-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Luk Claes wrote: > Raphael Geissert wrote: > >> I currently don't have enough time to write a script that gathers the >> versions information from the origin package to use when MBR. But here is >> what I believe needs to be done: >> >> * Encourage package maintainers to keep the old changelog