On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 03:40:32AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > The attached file is the diff for my oleo 1.99.16-11 QA upload.
>
> I just realised I missed bug #477575 ("copyright incomplete, any license for
> afm/* files?", filed yesterday) which should be fixed before any
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:56:47AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Yes, I think so, but it's not clear when debcheck or edos-debcheck
> should be the recommended tool.
FWIW, I don't know if debcheck has a main page, but the various EDOS
tools have one (http://edos.debian.net) and a few days ago I a
In case someone it looking for an easy QA task, here is some suggestion:
Search for packages that are configured or built twice in the buildds.
Theory: The buildds first build the software my telling the debian/rules
makefile to create the target "build" (hopefully in some future
"build-arch") and
On 26/04/08 at 13:36 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> In case someone it looking for an easy QA task, here is some suggestion:
> Search for packages that are configured or built twice in the buildds.
>
> Theory: The buildds first build the software my telling the debian/rules
> makefile to create
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:07:11 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I've asked an upstream author how he thinks of this issue
and if I get any response, I'll report it here.
I got a reply from the upstream author today. He said
that he updated dvi2ps so tha
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mmh, wouldn't it be possible to analyze build logs and search for two
> (or more) occurences of the same "text"? I can provide build logs for
> all packages in Debian if someone is interested. Is there a tool doing
>
On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. I did some more work
> > on that, using the CSS already used for the PTS and for
> > release.debian.org.
>
> I'd l
On 26/04/08 at 17:48 +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:56:47AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Yes, I think so, but it's not clear when debcheck or edos-debcheck
> > should be the recommended tool.
>
> FWIW, I don't know if debcheck has a main page, but the various EDO
On 25/04/08 at 14:35 +0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > http://qa.debian.org/~lucas/bapase/bugs_rm_pkgs.txt (updated every 6 hours).
> > This script lists bugs that:
> > - are not marked as done
> > - don't affect testing, unstable or experimental
> > - don't belong to a package in testing, uns
On 25/04/08 at 15:07 +0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-16 14:31]:
> > In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. I did some more
> > work on that, using the CSS already used for the PTS and for
> > release.debian.org. The result can be viewed on
>
On 26/04/08 at 11:42 +0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> One more question: there's a currently an email alias which receives a
> message for each package that is removed from Debian. Are you
> interested in receiving these emails, or should we get rid of it?
The email alias should probably be kept.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. I did some more work
> > > on that, using
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
Perhaps a different colour would be better? Something like this maybe:
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=mancala
If not, no big deal, I'll ad
* Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-26 19:17]:
> > Do you think you could add one optional step to bugs_rm_pkgs.rb:
> > exclude all bugs from packages that are listed in the removals.txt
> > file. You could generate a file bugs_unknown_pkgs.txt and then I
> > could go through them.
>
>
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:53:22PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
>
> Perhaps a different colour would be better? Something like this maybe:
>
> http://buildd.de
On 26/04/08 at 11:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In december, I worked a bit
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/04/08 at 11:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
> >
Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Hi,
> just annoyed by repeated cron files output from removed packages I
> implemented a
> new test for packages: no output from cron files of removed packages.
>
> The interesting bit is here:
> http://qa.debian.org/~filippo/crontest/20070801-crontest.log
>
> the log
On 26/04/08 at 12:28 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:53:22PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
> >
> > Perhaps a different colo
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:06:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> The problem with such style changes is that when people are used to
> something, the new style always look ugly. I even considered the new PTS
> layout ugly in the beginning.
>
> For this change, I think that collapsed borders lo
On 11367 March 1977, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> > Do you think you could add one optional step to bugs_rm_pkgs.rb:
>> > exclude all bugs from packages that are listed in the removals.txt
>> > file. You could generate a file bugs_unknown_pkgs.txt and then I
>> > could go through them.
>> Is there
Hi, all.
From: Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dvi2ps
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:59:41 -0400
> OK folks I have built a package with the 4.1j version on the site. I'm
> not super familiar with dvi2ps so any chance I could get some testers?
>
> It would also be nice if Ohura could
22 matches
Mail list logo
