Please see this site in Subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be
architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depends field.
This is usually bug either because of a missing Depends or because the
package should be Archit
On 02/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hello all,
Maw.
> I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be
> architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depends
> field. This is usually bug either because of a missing Depends or
> because the package should
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be
> architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depends field.
Your list seems to contain alot of packages that do have a Depends
Hello Kurt,
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should be
>> architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a Depends
>> field.
>
> Your list seems to con
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>db (U)
>zsh
My first suggestion is to list binary packages instead of source.
Then I could say that db4.6-doc is already arch:all
and that zsh-static is a false positive.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hello Cyril,
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hm, what about checking their *content*? What about listing *binary*
> packages?
Forgot to mention that, based on the binary-amd64 Packages file of the main,
contrib and non-free sections.
I didn't check the content of the packages because that's something
li
On 02/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Your list seems to contain alot of packages that do have a Depends
> > field.
>
> Like which one? I used a lot of grepping so maybe something was left
> in.
Take any random package, let's say icecc:
$ apt-cache show icecc|grep ^Depends:
Depends: libc6 (
> My first suggestion is to list binary packages instead of source.
> What about listing *binary* packages?
That would be the doing of dd-list alone, it seems.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:17:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>klibc
>linux-2.6 (U)
OMG, I wish we knew about this before, we clearly would have saved a
_lot_ of buildd time.
Seriously, did you even _read_ the list you just submitted ? at least
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:38:32PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I've written a script which tries to detect packages which should
> >> be
> >> architecture all base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just to clarify to everybody, the list was screwed up by dd-list (my bad,
didn't see the '-b' option part). Thanks to Adeodato for pointing that out.
So, here's the list of binary packages (attachment is dd-list -u again).
Anibal Avelar (Fixxxer) <[E
Interesting idea, though so few packages lack dependencies that it won't
catch much. Perhaps grepping for package that don't depend on any shared
libraries would catch more?
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>klibc
>linux-2.6 (U)
heh
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL
On 02/01/2008, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Forgot to mention that, based on the binary-amd64 Packages file of the
> main, contrib and non-free sections.
> I didn't check the content of the packages because that's something
> linda/lintian should do
Wondering why, I asked what they were supposed to
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>libgss-dbg (U)
>shishi-dbg (U)
rrght...
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO
Hello Joey,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Interesting idea, though so few packages lack dependencies that it won't
> catch much. Perhaps grepping for package that don't depend on any shared
> libraries would catch more?
>
Nice idea, though I'll first wait for everybody to read my last message
(Message-ID:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >libgss-dbg (U)
> >shishi-dbg (U)
>
> rrght...
Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have emp
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:58:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> Just to clarify to everybody, the list was screwed up by dd-list (my bad,
> didn't see the '-b' option part). Thanks to Adeodato for pointing that out.
> So, here's the list of binary packages (attachment is dd-list -u again).
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>libgss-dbg (U)
>>shishi-dbg (U)
>
> rrght...
>
-dbg package without a Depends? that sounds like a bug (please read my first
message).
Depends: sishi
Depe
On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
> Depends line.
After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
being Architecture: all or any.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpTQTr7Qidre.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:16:21PM +, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
> > Depends line.
>
> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
> being Architecture: all or a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:11:40PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >libgss-dbg (U)
> > >shishi-dbg (U)
> >
> > r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'll consider your message as sent (won't verify timestamps) before I
clarified the situation both by mail and on IRC.
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> Maybe there's rather a bug in your process. Instead of speaking of
> “plenty of greps”, you might want
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:04:44PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >libgss-dbg (U)
> >shishi-dbg (U)
>
> rrght...
Those are buggy AFAICT not due to being arch:all, but due to a miss
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
>> Depends line.
>
> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
> being Architecture: all or any.
>
Quoting my self (first message):
>
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:17:24 -0600, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello all, I've written a script which tries to detect packages which
> should be architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a
> Depends field. This is usually bug either because of a missing
> Depend
Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
>> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
>>> Depends line.
>> After a third thought, I still fail to see what that has to do with
>> being Architecture: all or any.
>>
>
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 08:04:44PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:58:24PM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>libgss-dbg (U)
>>>shishi-dbg (U)
>> rrght...
> Though after a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 03:06:21PM -0500, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:17:24 -0600, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Hello all, I've written a script which tries to detect packages which
> > should be architecture all based on the fact that they don't contain a
> > De
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> I fail to see why. Imagine for example a -dev package providing only .h
> files, but depending on the architecture. It has to be Architecture: any
> and does not need to Depends on a package.
I know I'm hidding behind my 'the results may contain many false positives'
st
On 02/01/2008, Colin Watson wrote:
> While the breakage would be obvious in the case of packages containing
> ELF binaries, […]
Not necessarily, one could remember of RC bugs opened for some months
due to arch: all packages containing shared objects, and its maintainer
wondering what was happening
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:39:17PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Raphael Geissert a écrit :
> > Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/01/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >>> Though after a second thought, -dbg should probably not have empty
> >>> Depends line.
> >> After a third thought, I still
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:17:08PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Parts of it are pretty ugly (and the Packages-fetching part isn't there),
> but I'm attaching it anyway.
Tying together grep-dctrl and dd-list would probably be a cleaner
approach. I haven't done a thorough comparison to your lis
On 02/01/2008, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Now, adding a Depends on all those 4 binary packages in tracker-dbg
> seems wrong to me. I don't want to force people to install
> tracker-search-tool if they only want to debug tracker.
What about being a bit more subtle and play around with Recommends: (or
m
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:18:46PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> So, what's the proper solution to that? Cluttering the archive with a
> load of -dbg packages or leave it as is?
The solution I took for the Vim packages was to have ORed Depends on all
of the binary packages that the -dbg package co
Raphael Geissert schrieb:
>
> Just to clarify to everybody, the list was screwed up by dd-list (my bad,
> didn't see the '-b' option part). Thanks to Adeodato for pointing that out.
> So, here's the list of binary packages (attachment is dd-list -u again).
>
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 22:18, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Raphael Geissert schrieb:
> > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >tracker-dbg
>
> Currently tracker-dbg holds the debugging symbols for the binary
> packages: tracker, tracker-search-tool, libtrackerclient0 and
> libtracker-gtk0.
> I
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 16:32:48 -0500, James Vega wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 02:17:08PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Parts of it are pretty ugly (and the Packages-fetching part isn't there),
> > but I'm attaching it anyway.
>
> Tying together grep-dctrl and dd-list would probably b
I have finished testing my new version of lintian's html_reports script
and have put up the pages it generates in a temporary location for people
to look at. Please take a look at:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports-testing/
and let me know what's broken.
Some notes:
* The HTML is intention
Hi Russ,
On Thursday 3 January 2008 01:16, Russ Allbery wrote:
> http://lintian.debian.org/reports-testing/
This looks good in general, it's a clear improvement over what we have.
> * The HTML pages are now templatized (using Text::Template). The core of
> many of the pages is still gener
40 matches
Mail list logo
