Hi,
[I originally planned to discuss this during the QA meeting. But it might
be a better idea to first start the discussion on the mailing list, so
we get a rough idea of the things that have to be discussed in the
meeting.]
There's a number of packages in Debian that are poorly maintained, or
t
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
Hi Lucas
Current status
--
Michael Ablassmeier and me filed some bugs some time ago on packages
that were good candidates for orphaning or removal from Debian. The list
can be viewed at [1]. However, we haven't orphaned/removed the packages
so far.
Only
On 10/10/07 at 11:35 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Why do we need a workflow for that?
>> ---
>> There's an authority problem in Debian. Even if nobody disagrees that a
>> package should be removed, if the maintainer is unresponsive, usually,
>> nobody takes the decisio
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:35:36AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> - Maintainer's MIA status
> This is also outside the scope of the proposal IMHO as MIA maintainers and
> their packages are already covered by the MIA team.
On the other hand if a package has a maintainer who
Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 11:35:36AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
- Maintainer's MIA status
This is also outside the scope of the proposal IMHO as MIA maintainers and
their packages are already covered by the MIA team.
On the other hand if a package has a
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> That's of course the other way around.
The original list only talked about feeding the MIA status in, not how.
>A badly maintained package can
> indicate a MIA maintainer and should probably be
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:53:48PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 04:13:53PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> > That's of course the other way around.
>
> The original list only talked about feeding the MIA status in, not how.
Let me rephrase: there is already a process that deals
7 matches
Mail list logo
