On Monday 6 August 2007 05:12, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Anthony, would it be possible to generate that page when a new package
> > enters the queue?
>
> In theory, but not in practice right atm. Has there been any public
> discussion about these pages actually being useful? I'm still fairly
> nervo
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 03:35:54PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Really nice work :-)
>
> Regarding the list format, you got it right. You don't need to add a
> fake build time: when needed, I'll change mergeresults.rb so that it
> works even with a different number of fields (I wanted t
heya,
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:09:48AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> indeed, when the next piuparts run is scheduled anyway? It might help to
> file/discuss bugs as the recent update-inetd "breakage" (see d-d at [0])
i was doing a piuparts test on a spare machine 2 weeks ago, .. resulted in
On 11103 March 1977, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> Could we do any action for let maintainers to adopt this watch file?
> I'd suggest bug filling and NMUing if necessary. I volunteer for helping
> on it.
A watchfile is IMO no reason to do any NMU. Its, at best, a wishlist severity
bug.
--
bye J
I've seen that lxdoom has been orphaned. It can be safely removed:
While lxdoom is completely dead upstream, we have a cleaned-up
fork of lxdoom in the archive, which is actively maintained: prboom.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [
5 matches
Mail list logo
