Bug#433327: qa.debian.org: Watch Unstable cell does shows outdated info

2007-07-16 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Watch Unstable cell displays different information than http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/ output My case: On http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 'mon' package shows '0.99.2' as upstream found version is in sync with version unstable/experimental while on

Re: [Piuparts-devel] piuparts improvements status

2007-07-16 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
[ Ccing #389223 ] On 15/07/07 at 19:19 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > I am planning to look this next week to the cowbuilder integration. > There is already a patch in the BTS (#389223), but it does not fully > integrate piuparts with cowbuilder. I'm wondering if this is the good way to go. cowdanc

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.08.1426 +0200]: > The right way to fix this bug is to follow the plan described there: > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/pts > (under the paragraph "Integrate better with > @packages.debian.org") > > I can easily create the "contact" ke

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.08.1426 +0200]: > > The right way to fix this bug is to follow the plan described there: > > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/pts > > (under the paragraph "Integrate better with > > @pack

Processed: user [EMAIL PROTECTED], usertagging 433327, merging 433327 431319

2007-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6 > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). > usertags 433327 + dehs Bug#433327: qa.debian.org: Watch Unstable cell does shows outdated info Ther

Bug#433095: marked as done (DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages)

2007-07-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:43:45 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.16.2026 +0200]: > Feel free to start that script first. :-) Adding the keyword is > a matter of minutes. The point was that I wanted to verify the operation of the script on my own packages first. But I'll get on this, probably during my v

Bug#377282: mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] not delivered to maintainer by default

2007-07-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.16.2026 +0200]: > > Feel free to start that script first. :-) Adding the keyword is > > a matter of minutes. > > The point was that I wanted to verify the operation of the script on > my ow

Bug#433095: DDPO: does not show all my sponsored packages

2007-07-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Christoph Berg wrote: > > The "Uploader:" tooltip shows only a key ID, but that key id is in fact (a > > subkey of) my key. Maybe it doesn't handle subkeys correctly? > > Hi, > > this is another instance of "the projectb doesn't know your keyid > yet" that happens to every n