Hello =)
As you might already know, i am currently working in piuparts. I should
have sent some kind of report about this before, but I'm afraid send
reports is something i'm not very good at :(
So far, i have implemented some minor features and fixed a couple of bugs.
This is detailed in the
Hi folks,
The sanduhr package has been orphaned for over a year; in the orphaning
upload, the maintainer, who is also upstream, commented that he has no time
for working on the package or the upstream software.
This is a gtk+1.2 application that has seen no upstream activity since 2004;
it has 22
Hi,
On Sun Jul 15, 2007 at 15:33:27 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Should sanduhr be removed from unstable?
seconded, even so it has 175 users according popcon.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
reassign 360269 ftp.debian.org
tag 360269 + remove remove-roqa
thanks
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The sanduhr package has been orphaned for over a year; in the orphaning
> upload, the maintainer, who is also upstream, commented that he has no time
> for working on
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> reassign 360269 ftp.debian.org
OK, I may have been a bit quick on this one: today, Clint has uploaded
packages for sanduhr. Shall I reassign the bug to wnpp?
--
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On 7/16/07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a gtk+1.2 application that has seen no upstream activity since 2004;
it has 22 active users according to popcon, and there doesn't appear to be
anything I would describe as a gtk+2.0 alarm clock in the archive, but it's
one of only tw
6 matches
Mail list logo
