Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Here's the ideas that I have heard (and written) during the "Supporting
> 15.000 packages" BoF which happened during DebConf7. I should probably
> have posted this earlier, but, well, better now than never...
Thanks for taking notes.
> The security team is already overloa
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 05:15:49PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
> debtags seemed the most passable choice. I believe we need:
> * [etch|lenny]-security-unsupported to flag that a source package has no
> support by the Security Team. It should be distribution-specific to
> allow revoking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 431670
Bug#431670: packages.qa.d.o "patches" link broken
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
reopen 431670
thanks
Unless PTS is not yet run its job, this issue is still here.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcairo.html has "todo - 4 patches"
link with old BTS syntax.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 matches
Mail list logo