Hi,
On Tue, March 6, 2007 06:34, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:43 +, Regis Boudin wrote:
>> Playing around with dependencies trees, I noticed there are quite a few
>> obsolete Conflicts fields in the archive. Would it be worth starting a
>> bit of cleanup after Etch is release
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:43:57AM +, Regis Boudin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I might be completely wrong, but...
>
> Playing around with dependencies trees, I noticed there are quite a few
> obsolete Conflicts fields in the archive. Would it be worth starting a
> bit of cleanup after Etch is relea
On Tue, March 6, 2007 09:34, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> great, are these results published somewhere? Trivial obsoleted conflicts
> might
> be removed via a wishlist bug.
No actual result at the moment. I was playing with something not really
related and noticed the impressive number on conflicts
Hi,
On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
it might be interesting to talk to the EDOS people about that. It's
possible that their tools could help to find obsolete conf
On Tue, March 6, 2007 11:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
>> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
>> all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
>
> it might be interesting to talk to the EDOS people about that. It
Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
[opening a new thread, since it was the original idea]
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm more worried about how you choose the environment you want to
dist-upgrade. Various criteria that come to my mind (braindump):
- base system
Regis Boudin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No actual result at the moment. I was playing with something not really
> related and noticed the impressive number on conflicts in the
> distribution, with many easily identifiable as very old packages. I just
> preferred asking if it was worth looking a
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:46:23PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> > I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> > all-packages review about old/obsolete conflicts.
>
> it might be interesting to talk to the E
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:04:46PM -, Regis Boudin wrote:
> On Tue, March 6, 2007 11:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 06/03/07 at 07:34 +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
> >> I think that it's difficult to find an approach for an efficient
> >> all-packages review about old/obsolete confli
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:23:13PM +0100, François Déchelle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm in the edos project, and there are I think 2 set of tools which can
> be usefull:
> - dependencies management tools, probably anla, but I don't know the
> dependencies management tools enough in depth to giv
10 matches
Mail list logo
