On Tue, Nov 14, 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > This is something that I'd really like to see us sort out in policy, since
> > I think we should be able to describe consistent behavior with regard to
> > system users and package purging to our users. Right now, every
> > maintainer is making their
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061115 03:12]:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:35:12PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> >> Hmm, I would read policy in a way that since a package can not rely on
> >> its dependencies being present during purge, the
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Have a look at http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dbus.html
It contains old message (2005-12-11) from britney before new
(2006-11-14) one.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (800, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable'), (1,
Hello Lucas,
Thank you for your work.
On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 18:44 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Here is a list of packages that fail when all packages except essential
> ones, apt and debfoster were removed, but didn't fail when debconf and
> ucf were kept. This indicates a missing dependency on
Stop the girls from laughing.
Stop being a boy, and become a man.
What we are trying to say isget a larger (d)ick.
Site Domain: bdman.net
**Cut and paste site domain into browser
Have a large day;
Donna Gomes
The Extenders
No more?
bdman.net/r.php
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
5 matches
Mail list logo
