Remove: hubcot -- orphaned, rc buggy, dead upstream, broken?

hi, i suggest to remove hubcot for the following reasons: * dead upstream, last release in 2001 * orphaned for about 4 months now * RC buggy, does not build against kernel 2.6.18, needs complete overhaul for new kernel build system etc. #393524 * already removed from testing any object

Can vaiostat be removed?

Hi all, The vaiostat package: * Is not in testing; * Is RC-buggy; * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; * Is inactive upstream. Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, especially from

Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hi all, > > The vaiostat package: > > * Is not in testing; > * Is RC-buggy; > * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; > * Is inactive upstream. > > Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think

Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream thanks On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 05:26 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > No skin off my nose. Feel free. Ok, doing so (and labeling RoM seems appropriate). thanks, Thijs signature.asc Descrip

Re: Remove: hubcot -- orphaned, rc buggy, dead upstream, broken?

Hi Michael! You wrote: > i suggest to remove hubcot for the following reasons: I already filed a bug about its removal: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395502 -- Kind regards, ++ | Bas Zoetekouw

Re: Can vaiostat be removed?

Scripsit Thijs Kinkhorst > Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think > it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, > especially from the maintainers? Go ahead. As the last active maintainer, I have been meaning to file for removal for some t