Hello,
I was examining #385980 (grub - clean target does not undo changes).
What is happening here is that the build system is running autotools
(aclocal; automake; autoconf) which are rewriting some of the files
distributed by upstream (which are also autotools generated but by an
older version
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering whether Debian policy regarding the 'clean' target
> is to be interpreted as applying to the autotools generated files as
> well. (As currently stated it would appear to be so).
>
> If so then the following alternate approaches wou
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Matej Vela wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I was wondering whether Debian policy regarding the 'clean' target
> > is to be interpreted as applying to the autotools generated files as
> > well. (As currently stated it would appear to be so).
> >
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> submitter 382326 !
Bug#382326: missing /dev/mdX cause assembly to fail *and* to generate missing
nodes
Changed Bug submitter from martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to martin
f.kra
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> I was wondering whether Debian policy regarding the 'clean' target
> is to be interpreted as applying to the autotools generated files as
> well. (As currently stated it would appear to be so).
Many of us read the policy for "clean" to "generate a
On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Sep 2006, Matej Vela wrote:
> > Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I was wondering whether Debian policy regarding the 'clean' target
> > > is to be interpreted as applying to the autotools generated files as
> >
6 matches
Mail list logo
