Re: RM: ud -- RoQA; orphaned, no upstream, uptimed is better

Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On 10734 March 1977, Matej Vela wrote: >>> * popcon: 261 installs, 177 votes. > > This is actually quite a lot -- more than the level I'd use for removals, > FYI. IMHO, popcon is helpful, but not the determining criterion for removal. If popcon is

Old maintainers in the Uploaders: field

Re: Matt Zimmerman 2006-08-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'd be indeed interested. Also please tell me if you are still > > interested in apt-listchanges work (as a maintainer or upstream). > > I am happy to be listed as an uploader for informational purposes, e.g. to > be contacted by the maintaine