On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:18:13PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
Yes. Deleting information is a big step.
Luckily we aren't doing that, since the information itself is still
available in archives.
I was myself bit by this, when the gnome maintainers decided that
gnome-1 was obsolete, a
Hi all,
I was looking at the list of packages that are orphaned but don't have
their maintainer set to QA[1]. First package on the list is messagewall,
so I went looking for a new upstream (mentioned in #249840). I talked to
the upstream ex-maintainer on freenode @ Fri Jun 16 22:56:24 +0800 2006:
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s)
and to other interested parties to accompany the original report.
Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If you wish
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:18:13PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Yes. Deleting information is a big step.
>
> Luckily we aren't doing that, since the information itself is still
> available in archives.
Whose archives? Ours? Perhaps if you woul
Paul Wise wrote:
> To debian-qa folks and the debian maintainer:
> What do we think about removing messagewall from debian?
It will be sad to see it go, as I have used it thoroughly (though not in
Debian systems, and with great bitterness beacuse of this).
Knowing Messagewall as I do, in my opini
5 matches
Mail list logo
