Bug#338048: hints description

2006-04-07 Thread Justin Pryzby
retitle 338048 Please refer to DevRef for a discussion of testing hints reassign 338048 www.debian.org thanks There is a pretty-good description of hints here: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs#s-details I think it is sufficient if devel/testing/ would reference that sectio

Re: amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > FTBFS. All of those you can probably summarize under bit-rot. The > Debian-amd64 team has now started doing some aggressive porter NMUs > (policy allows them after 7 days so don't come screaming if we NMU > some month old bug)

Re: amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> FTBFS. All of those you can probably summarize under bit-rot. The >> Debian-amd64 team has now started doing some aggressive porter NMUs >> (policy allows them after 7 days so don't

Re: MIA: Thomas Fasth? (was: Re: About the maintainance of monotone)

2006-04-07 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Adrian von Bidder 2006-04-06 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > QA/MIA people: are you reading this (below)? Or Thomas - perhaps you have > time to dropa a quick note yourself? We are reading -qa, yes. (And -devel, but things are harder to spot there.) You could have checked the pinging going on current

amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Pierre Habouzit
It looks like that the archive has now been built, and that only newly uploaded packages, and packages that Dep-Wait on Failed builds remains. Maybe is it time to authorize amd64 uploads ? Moreover, looking at [1], there is a quite rather impressive list of package that FTBFS since ages, that

Re: amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Moreover, looking at [1], there is a quite rather impressive list of > package that FTBFS since ages, that are apparently unmaintained, and > whose maintainer looks like to be MIA since more than a year (all > packages are the same version as in sta

Re: amd64 uploads

2006-04-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Moreover, looking at [1], there is a quite rather impressive list of > > package that FTBFS since ages, that are apparently unmaintained, and > > whose maintainer looks like to

Processed: hints description

2006-04-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 338048 Please refer to DevRef for a discussion of testing hints Bug#338048: *.d.o: Please document ftp hints Changed Bug title. > reassign 338048 www.debian.org Bug#338048: Please refer to DevRef for a discussion of testing hints Bug reassigned