Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 359110 /org/bugs.debian.org/etc/indices/sources outdated
Bug#359110: PTS: Existing bugs not shown in PTS
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 359110 bugs.debian.org
Bug#359110: /org/bugs.debian.org/etc/indices/sources outdated
Bug reassigned from pack
retitle 359110 /org/bugs.debian.org/etc/indices/sources outdated
reassign 359110 bugs.debian.org
severity 359110 important
thanks
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 07:16:51PM +0200, Miguel Gea Milvaques wrote:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dacco.html
>
> Shows that dacco has no errors, but this error:
Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:53:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Developers summary page only showing a fraction of his packages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
reopen 356042 =
thanks
The watch column is still broken, all my packages (they all have watch
files) are listed with 'Error' in the watch column.
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adriaan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 356042 =
Bug#356042: qa.debian.org: watch column broken, completely no results for any
package
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admin
Hi!
On 3/25/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 18:20 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > I still don't see good reasons to merge the 4 programs :-/
>
> It's of course always a tradeoff between the extra work of merging
> things and the possible benefits. I c
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Just in the case that none of the 4 authors want to merge the
> programs. We will create one Debian package, containing the 4
> programs, with a wrapper (a "pngoptimizer", for example), that will
> select one of the programs, based on the
Hi!
(I am CCing Alexander)
On 3/28/06, Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the light of Alexander Schmehl's message in this thread on
> debian-qa in March 2005 you may want to adopt pngcrush as a first step.
Is the ITA (#353392) not active?
Alexander said on 23 Mar 2006:
"Howev
Hello,
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Is the ITA (#353392) not active?
> Alexander said on 23 Mar 2006:
>
> "However, I want be able to upload a fixed package till mid/end of next week."
IMHO this was a typo and he meant:
"However, I wont be able to upload a fixed package t
9 matches
Mail list logo
