Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account

2006-01-19 Thread Duck
Coin, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is this a new problem? Maybe it is related to the packages.debian.org > problems. This is a recent problem, but qa.d.o is working for most people, so this is probably unrelated. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgp74qM8p8pmB.pgp Description: PGP sig

Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account

2006-01-19 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Marc Dequènes [Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:17:21 +0100]: > BTW, i'm to feed a bug against b.d.o for a similar problem. This is very > annoying to be unable to use our important tools, thus the severity. (For the record, #348859, and as noted there, case-sensivity related. Marc uses [EMAIL PROTECTED

Bug#348810: marked as done (QA Developer summary page broken for duck account)

2006-01-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:33:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Re: Bug#348810: marked as done (QA Developer summary page broken for duck account)

2006-01-19 Thread Kai Geek
Hello Marc, I couldn't find any errors. I think there's an bug in code structure. I'll correct this bugging fixed and send the last package. Regards, > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: important > > Look at this: > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=3Dslune&comaint=3Dyes > > BTW

Bug#348810: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#348810: QA Developer summary page broken for duck account)

2006-01-19 Thread Duck
Coin, > Re: Adeodato Sim=F3 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> (For the record, #348859, and as noted there, case-sensivity related. >> Marc uses [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the maintainer field, not [EMAIL PROTECTED] > p.org). > > Fixed in CVS, thanks. Thanks a lot :-) I just discovered the link for packa

Re: Bug#346856: security bug needs upload along with xlibs-dev transition Re: Bug#346856: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

2006-01-19 Thread Jacob Luna Lundberg
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:45:05AM -0800, Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:37:52AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Well, I can't confirm this. Jacob, please consider the attached > > patch, which fixes some quoting issues in configure.ac and > > re-autoconfs the source. Co

Re: Bug#346856: security bug needs upload along with xlibs-dev transition Re: Bug#346856: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

2006-01-19 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote: > If you or Thomas can do the upload for me, that would be great. > The updated version can be downloaded from: > http://www.gnifty.net/code/xscorch/ OK, I've built it and, should it pass my testing, will upload. I took the liberty to document in the changelog that no cha

Re: Bug#346856: security bug needs upload along with xlibs-dev transition Re: Bug#346856: intent to upload sponsored NMU to fix xlibs-dev bug

2006-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:43:09AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Jacob Luna Lundberg wrote: > > If you or Thomas can do the upload for me, that would be great. > > The updated version can be downloaded from: > > http://www.gnifty.net/code/xscorch/ > OK, I've built it and, should it pass my testin

Bug#348971: qa.debian.org: please consider converting PTS to a CSS layout

2006-01-19 Thread Marc Haber
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, the output of the PTS (http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/clamav-data.html) still uses a table-driven layout which is a bitch to parse. Please consider converting to CSS. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT pre