Hey,
Thanks for everything. I really appreciate all your help.
Stephan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Singer wrote:
>> You need to replace xlibs-dev dependency by the appropriate dev-packages
>> that it has been split up into (in the case of buici-clock, those
>> probably are libx11-dev, libxext-dev, x-dev).
>
> Already done. This new problem is due to the change. I used the
> proscribed scr
Here are some more bugs needing uploads. This list includes packages
which needed replacement direct dependencies, are tested in pbuilder,
and have no changes reported by debdiff save for some
version/size/depends stuff.
Build logs are all available at
http://justinpryzby.com/debian/xlibs-dev/
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I also note the following packages are "hard" to NMU, because of some
> problem like another FTBFS or the package being native when it should
> not be. I'm untagging these 'patch' now.
Let me elaborate on these
> arla-0.36.2
The fo
Is Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/mia.html
Last upload: 2004-08-02
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=xpcd
2 rc bugs
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=295174
RC bug 1 year no response;
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi
Can we remove xpcd?
Package reported obsolete upstream
FTBFS bug no response
Probable MIA maintainer
Not in testing
If this is reasonable to someone else, then file the RM bug.
--
Clear skies,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
tag 346970 - patch
tag 346808 - patch
tag 346801 - patch
tag 346796 - patch
thanks
These packages are difficult to NMU because they are native when they
should not be.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Justin,
Great work on the transition!
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 12:52 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> These packages are difficult to NMU because they are native when they
> should not be.
Do you think so? When a package is unjustified-native this is of course
a but, but not a release critical o
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Can we remove xpcd?
Hmmm, I would prefer if the long standing bugs with patches would be
fixed.
Package reported obsolete upstream
Even if reported obsolete this package is know to be robust in showing
Kodak PCDs while other programs sometimes fail
Can we remove cthugha?
FTBFS RC bug no response 1 year
Probable MIA maintainer
Not in testing
If this is reasonable to someone else, please file the RM bug.
--
Clear skies,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Is Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/mia.html
Last upload: 2004-07-06
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=cthugha
2 rc bugs
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294028
RC bug 1 year no response;
--
Clear skies,
Justin
-
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> #347146: xlbiff
Today I'll only get that one, but take the liberty to fix this:
+Build-Depends: debhelper, libxaw7-dev (>> 4.0.3) (>> 4.0.3), xutils,
libxt-dev, x-dev
(The second >> is a leftover of the xlibs-dev...)
> I also note the following packages are "hard" to NMU, b
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:51:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > #347146: xlbiff
> Today I'll only get that one, but take the liberty to fix this:
> +Build-Depends: debhelper, libxaw7-dev (>> 4.0.3) (>> 4.0.3), xutils,
> libxt-dev, x-dev
> (The second >> is a leftover of
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:21:41PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I also note the following packages are "hard" to NMU, because of some
> > problem like another FTBFS or the package being native when it should
> > not be. I'm untag
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:21:41PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:24:56AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>> arla-0.36.2
>> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>> kerberos4kth-dev
> krb4 is being removed from etch
Is Alen Zekulic MIA?
Can we remove felt?
Alen Zekulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Last upload: 2004-06-01
Possible MIA maintainer
felt
4 RC bugs
Not in testing
--
Clear skies,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Let me explain :)
I created this script allowing many packages to be pbuilt and patched
nearly automatically. It isn't intended to be fully automatic,
because someone should actually read the .diff, of course. It runs
pbuild using the recommended build-deps, and uses debdiff to assert
that nothi
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
>
> http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/mia.html
> Last upload: 2004-07-06
That page seems wrong.
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
alias: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Last upload: 2005-11-16
I
Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
>> http://haydn.debian.org/~thuriaux-guest/qa/mia.html
>> Last upload: 2004-07-06
> That page seems wrong.
> Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> alias: Brian Nels
Is Christian Bayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIA?
Can we remove crystalspace?
4 RC bugs
Neither in testing nor the previous stable release
--
Clear skies,
Justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 17:21:51 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Is Alen Zekulic MIA?
No I am not, however I am on the road and far away from home, with
limited access to the net.
> Can we remove felt?
Please don't do that. I'll be back soon.
--
Alen Zekulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCR
21 matches
Mail list logo
