I looked at bts.turmzimmer.net and defined 'old' to be older than 365 days.
Most of the bugs are non-free documentation bugs (which irritates me; I wish
the maintainers would do their duty). Several of the others are woody-only,
so I version-marked them (though I might have screwed that up).
Perh
Hi!
Nathanael Nerode [2006-01-05 3:29 -0500]:
> 281893 -- patched uninstallable bug in libroken16-kerberos4kth
> Orphan package and make QA upload?
Just my 2 cents: Is there any reason why we should keep krb4 in the
first place? It's horribly old, out of date, and broken security-wise
years ag
* Martin Pitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060105 10:08]:
> Nathanael Nerode [2006-01-05 3:29 -0500]:
> > 281893 -- patched uninstallable bug in libroken16-kerberos4kth
> > Orphan package and make QA upload?
>
> Just my 2 cents: Is there any reason why we should keep krb4 in the
> first place? It's hor
Hi Nathanael!
You wrote:
> 284914 -- trivial bug in klogd.
> I still say we switch to another syslogd implementation and remove
> sysklogd entirely. It's got 4 RC bugs and 99 bugs total, including 34
> patches. Effectively, it's unmaintained, but Joey hasn't orphaned it.
> It's a sloppy
Hi Stefan,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2006, Stefan Potyra wrote:
> I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal:
> Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed
> an
> ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet.
>
> Since this packag
On 1/4/06, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal:
> Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed an
> ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet.
>
> Since this packa
Is it possible to add a new/unknown user name just to display
information about a set packages, which I explicitely add to the list
using the control bot?
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Nathanael!
>
> You wrote:
>
>
>>284914 -- trivial bug in klogd.
>> I still say we switch to another syslogd implementation and remove
>> sysklogd entirely. It's got 4 RC bugs and 99 bugs total, including 34
>> patches. Effectively, it's unmaintained, but Joey hasn'
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:08:35AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode [2006-01-05 3:29 -0500]:
> > 281893 -- patched uninstallable bug in libroken16-kerberos4kth
> > Orphan package and make QA upload?
> Just my 2 cents: Is there any reason why we should keep krb4 in the
> first place
Message [051_1444inoa840.pro] triggered rule [File Extension Remover] at
2:44:43 PM 1/5/2006
Sender: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Recipient(s): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hi,_ive_a_new_mail_address
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Hi!
Steve Langasek [2006-01-05 12:06 -0800]:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:08:35AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
>
> > Nathanael Nerode [2006-01-05 3:29 -0500]:
> > > 281893 -- patched uninstallable bug in libroken16-kerberos4kth
> > > Orphan package and make QA upload?
>
> > Just my 2 cents: Is t
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 00:45 +1100, skaller wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 03:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > While insiders are not qualified to comment on how outsiders *feel* about
> > the process, they are certainly the people to judge whether the *outcome* of
> > the process is the corre
No uploads since the release of sarge. No response to RC bug reports.
Last upload 2004-08-02.
sp-gxmlcpp, xpcd, and uae have RC bugs. gom is the only one which doesn't,
and it prompts without debconf.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Insert famous quote here]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
13 matches
Mail list logo
