Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Margarita Manterola
Hi! One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the difficulty of solving them (trivial, easy, interesting, tedious, difficult guru-level). The main ide

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Joey Hess
Margarita Manterola wrote: > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the difficulty of > solving them (trivial, easy, interesting, tedious, diffic

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 8/3/05, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Margarita Manterola wrote: > > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > > the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the difficulty of > >

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Margarita Manterola wrote: > > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > > the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the diffic

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:15 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Margarita Manterola wrote: > > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > > the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the difficulty of

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:35 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On 8/3/05, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Margarita Manterola wrote: > > > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > > > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > > > th

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:50 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > Hi! > > One of the things that I proposed in my talk during Debconf5 is to > have a friendlier bug interface that allows for bugs to be sorted on > the language (c, python, perl, etc) of the code, and the difficulty of > solving them

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Margarita Manterola
On 8/3/05, Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The difficulty of solving a bug can't be tracked so easily. What's hard > to me will be easy for others and sometimes it's a moving target. Indeed. It's not like tagging a bug 'easy' would be written in stone. Someone may read the bug repo

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Margarita Manterola
> > Well, I thought of this, yes. But there are times when a program uses > > more than one language. For example, Oregano (an electronics program > > that I help maintain) is coded in C, uses a lot of GTK, but also has > > some perl scripts... So, if a bug occured in a perl script, it would > >

Re: Bugs, usertags, and including more people

2005-08-03 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 16:07 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > > Well, I thought of this, yes. But there are times when a program uses > > > more than one language. For example, Oregano (an electronics program > > > that I help maintain) is coded in C, uses a lot of GTK, but also has > > > som

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#320942: aspseek: FTBGS with gcc-4.0]

2005-08-03 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 04:34:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > This makes three open RC bugs against aspseek, and one fixed in NMU. The > maintainer (who is not a DD and has no other packages) has never replied to > any of them, and the last upload was an NMU over two years ago for the > *last*

C++ packages still compiled with gcc 2.95

2005-08-03 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I filed bugs against these packages. The first four appear to have been misbuilds by the maintainers. intel2gas queue robotour maelstrom (non-free) xmovie (contrib) However, xmovie seems to be severely undermaintained. Does anyone know David Martinez Moreno who can politely suggest that he eithe

Re: C++ packages still compiled with gcc 2.95

2005-08-03 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 08:59:02PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > However, xmovie seems to be severely undermaintained. Does anyone know > David Martinez Moreno who can politely suggest that he either do something > with it, orphan it, or remove it? Man, you've stopped following -x so soon? :-)