qa.debian.org doesn't find its keys

2005-07-15 Thread Matthias Urlichs
The web page says: Packages overview for Matthias Urlichs General information for Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (click to collapse) GPG key id not found! (key id was not found neither in the Debian keyring nor on a public keyserver) ... Known bug? -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Benjamin BAYART
Mike Stone: > > If you're pretty much automatically accepting any kind of contribution > it's not a debian package any more. Just set up your own package archive > somewhere for packages like this and encourage people to use it. > notquitedebian.org is available... My guess is that it sounds lik

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 02:48:39PM +0200, Benjamin BAYART wrote: > > Mike Stone: > > > > If you're pretty much automatically accepting any kind of contribution > > it's not a debian package any more. Just set up your own package archive > > somewhere for packages like this and encourage people to

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Michael Stone
I don't get it. If a maintainer still needs to review the patch and upload it, how is this different than the current situation? Mike Stone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Benjamin BAYART
Le Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar: > > As far as I can see though, there are not really technical problems > with the low maintainance of orphaned packages, but more the reason > that they are still orphaned -- nobody has a really big interest in > them. When you say

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Michael Stone
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:00:21PM +0200, Benjamin BAYART wrote: When you say that, or you're wrong, or "nobody" is to be understood as "nobody in the Debian developpers" in which case you're right. But the fact that a package is of no interest to a Debian developper does not prove the package to

your body bacteria, virus, micro organisams - kill them

2005-07-15 Thread Antidote Newsletter
Antidote that Kills Body Bacteria, Kills Body Virus and make your body Immunity System Healthy and Strong The Antidote is a unique Anti-Microbial Peptide offering the widest range of healing power on the market today. It kills all known deadly VIRUSES and BACTERIA in the body. The initial

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:00:21PM +0200, Benjamin BAYART wrote: > Le Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar: > > As far as I can see though, there are not really technical problems > > with the low maintainance of orphaned packages, but more the reason > > that they are stil

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Packages need to have maintainers -- meaning, someone needs to take > responsibility for the package. Orphaned packages *routinely* slip into > stable releases with release critical bugs that have been in the package > for a year or more, sometimes eve

Quality Financing made easy

2005-07-15 Thread Freddie Sheppard
Hi, Did you realize that you don't need to be paying high ratees on your current Mor|gage? If fact ratees are at the lowest they have been at in 50 Years! We are extending refi-nance opportuni.ties unheard of in the industry. How would you feel savving hundreds monthly locked in at 3.89 %? Just

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:07:28PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Packages need to have maintainers -- meaning, someone needs to take > > responsibility for the package. Orphaned packages *routinely* slip into > > stable releases with release critical

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> I think that if we had active users of a package who would report the >> bugs when they happen, orphaned packages wouldn't be as much of a risk. >> They have undetected RC bugs not because there isn't a maintainer so >> much as be

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Rich Walker
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Packages need to have maintainers -- meaning, someone needs to take >> responsibility for the package. Orphaned packages *routinely* slip into >> stable releases with release critical bugs that have been in

Important warranty bulletin

2005-07-15 Thread Warranty Dept.
Title: Protect Your Vehicle Continental Warranty 10850 Riverside Dr 6th Floor. North Hollywood, CA 91602 This email has been sent in compliance with CAN-Spam Act of 2003. Click Here to opt out of future solicitations. ?004 All Rights Reserve

ADD 3+ inches today - don't get left behind

2005-07-15 Thread Isolde
Penis Growth Patches are here! http://www.xunepa.com/ss/ Eternity is very long, especially towards the end. Don't open a shop unless you like to smile. Lawyers spend a great deal of their time shoveling smoke. History is the record of an encounter between character and circumstanc

Re: Idea for maintaining packages up for adoption

2005-07-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:49:32AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote: > And should the submitter of a bug be auto-subscribed to the bug? I > think at present it is possible to carry on a long debate on the BTS > without the original submitter knowing - which seems to miss the point? Auto-subscription proba

this is of course Sarah girl.....austin

2005-07-15 Thread Sarah
What happenin.its of course Sarah girl. What are u up too tonight? If you're not too busy lets talk on my webcam. www.zmnd.powerpuffgrills.com/sa16/ __ Vicki skullcap snore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou