dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Bluefuture
After another gruelling discussion on #debian-devel about the useless of dehs and the lack of watch file (75,60% of non native debian packages doesn't had one), I think that dehs is start to begin only my own personal toys, so i'm thinking to stop it and to leave alioth resources and put my develop

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There is no reason to put more work and effort on a community tool that > community itself consider useless. The community might start considering it less useless if an explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually available. In particula

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Bluefuture
>The community might start considering it less useless if an >explanation of what it is supposed to be good for was actually >available. In particular, why should a maintainer care about watch >files if he uses something else than uscan to keep track of upstream >happenings? >From time to time, th

old RFPs (was: RFP+ITP for the same package)

2005-02-27 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050219 22:20]: > > Should I rename the RFP to ITP and merge them or simply > > close the RFP? > Please do the former; this way the person who filed the RFP will be > informed when the package enters the archive. BTW: I recently take a look at the WNPP

Re: dehs will stop

2005-02-27 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>If people don't care as much about this as you think they should, >>perhaps it would be a good idea to try explaining why they *should* >>care, instead of just lamenting their lack of a telepathic >>understanding of your intentions? > This is not true. Y