Your message dated Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:24:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages.qa.d.o reports testing migration problem when there
isn't one
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
ubbbvhb
> What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to
> "wnpp," so they show up in the wnpp and the packages bug log.
Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs to show an additional
category "WNPP"?
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:47:08PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to
> > "wnpp," so they show up in the wnpp and the packages bug log.
>
> Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs to show an additional
> category "WNPP"?
Well, after a b
Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs to show an additional
> > category "WNPP"?
>
> Well, after a bit reflection, I think I'm against. Firstmost, because
> already now a lot of people don't seem to be able to get wnpp bugs
> right. Se
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:47:08PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> > What I mean is that those bugs should be reassigned to
>> > "wnpp," so they show up in the wnpp and the packages bug log.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to modify debbugs
reassign 266325 wnpp
retitle 266325 ITA: penggy -- allows you to connect to AOL via modem or TCP/IP
owner 266325 !
thanks
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:17:42AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>Opinions? If keeping it, it should at least get an QA upload setting
>maintainer appropriately.
I'll ne
7 matches
Mail list logo
