A lot of bugs are going to be filed on ndiswrapper-source.
Maintainer has made it easier to build-but-not-install
the module at the expense of breaking upgrades and causing
headaches for people who *will* install it, and either
he's failing to see this problem.
It's a wierd problem because the *pa
How about a Recommends?
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 11:43:45AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> A dependency wouldn't change that. A *versioned* dependency would,
> but it would be a little rediculous to add that when there's no need
> (afaik) for it.
You should at least add a Recommends, that way apt
This text should be in the bug report log.
Package maintainer is closing bugs too fast and hiding information
from the public without any discussion or peer review.
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:27:12PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> How about a Recommends?
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 11:43:45AM -
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 14:04 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> This text should be in the bug report log.
>
> Package maintainer is closing bugs too fast and hiding information
> from the public without any discussion or peer review.
>
Accusing me of such things, instead of attempting to work w/ me
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 02:40:42PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Figure out what you what, and file a proper bug. Don't give me
> hand-waving about things possibly breaking, and recommending I make
> changes that force things upon people. If you feel -source packages
> should have recommends/dep
5 matches
Mail list logo
