Re: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)

2004-08-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
reopen 255955 thanks Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Description: > mmake - Makefile generator for Java programs > Closes: 199875 216534 255955 > Changes: > mmake (2.2.1-4) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Updated copyright file so it include GPL in a correct way, closes: >

[opal@debian.org: Re: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)]

2004-08-17 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Forgot (or actually missed) to Cc the list with my reply. Regards, // Ola - Forwarded message from Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:48:23 +0200 From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Second announcement - Bug Squashing in Darmstadt, 20th - 22nd August 2004

2004-08-17 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
[ sent to all lists from the first announcement; please reply off-list ] Hi, As you may remember from this mailing list, a real-life Bug Squashing Party is taking place next weekend in conjunction with the Bug Squashing Week on IRC. The event will take place at the Department of Numerical Methods

Re: [opal@debian.org: Re: Accepted mmake 2.2.1-4 (all source)]

2004-08-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My reference comes from that GNUGPL.TXT in the source. > > The LICENSE file is a bit short but the GNUGPL.TXT file covers > everything just as it should. It just has an uncommon name, that > is all. The LICENSE file there is, alas, not sufficient. It

attempts to fix

2004-08-17 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
It turns out that fixing this bug is not trivial; it is merely one of a whole host of problems that are caused because apparently swig has changed its interface in a variety of ways. Adapting to the changes seems easy on the assumption that you understand swig, but I don't. Perhaps version 2.0.1