Returned mail

2004-06-11 Thread navadmin
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail. 550 5.1.1 User unknown Reporting-MTA: navadmin@dataviz.com Final-Recipient: rfc822;udph5hetmd0617@dataviz.com Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Advice on a certain maintainer]

2004-06-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this? Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any maintainer reaction is IMHO a bit problematic, a maintainer should really do something about at least the legal stuff of his package. I'd prefer some respected

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Advice on a certain maintainer]

2004-06-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-11 12:52]: > Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle > this? Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't > had any maintainer reaction is IMHO a bit problematic, a maintainer > should really do something

plz call me

2004-06-11 Thread Brittany Fuller
Hey, my name is jen and I'm new to this online dating thing. I've just my profile up, you should come check it out it's interesting. I just want to get to know you a little better if you don't mind, come check my profile out at: www.starjen.com/cam.html I also got a videocam so we can make it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Advice on a certain maintainer]

2004-06-11 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040611 12:55]: > Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this? > Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any > maintainer reaction is IMHO a bit problematic, a maintainer should > really do something about

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Advice on a certain maintainer]

2004-06-11 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Barth wrote: | * Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040611 12:55]: | |>Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this? |>Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any |>maintainer reaction i

Re: dehs and new watch files... was: Re: uscan over all packages....

2004-06-11 Thread Bluefuture
Hi, I had added to DEHS http://dehs.alioth.debian.org a new functionality about "by maintainer" dehs summary. Try it and make suggestion. Next step: dehs ovveride?? Colud be need some access restriction features for enter an overrided watch file (and test)? How Maintainer will integrate it in t

Re: dehs and new watch files... was: Re: uscan over all packages....

2004-06-11 Thread Frank Küster
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I had added to DEHS http://dehs.alioth.debian.org a new functionality > about "by maintainer" dehs summary. > > Try it and make suggestion. > > Next step: dehs ovveride?? > > Colud be need some access restriction features for enter an overrided > wat

Re: dehs and new watch files... was: Re: uscan over all packages....

2004-06-11 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 08:43:57PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > I don't understand why you need an overrides file. Why not just submit > wishlist bugs, with a link to a QA page that explains why a watch file > is a Good Thing[TM] even if it is of no use for the individual > maintainer? Because ma