Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Denis Barbier
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:38:32PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:37:57AM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I had a look at the kdrill package because it uses old-style debconf > > templates without the po-debconf system. I was about to build a patch to > > s

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:52:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Suggestions much appreciated. > > You should drop your debconf note, and put its content into NEWS.Debian. drat. just missed the packaging upload I did. But you might debate that point,with the debian person who filed a bug sugge

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Denis Barbier
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:28:04PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 07:52:43AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > Suggestions much appreciated. > > > > You should drop your debconf note, and put its content into NEWS.Debian. > > drat. just missed the packaging upload I did. >

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:47:12AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > But you might debate that point,with the debian person who filed a bug > > suggesting that I needed to do it with debconf in the first place ;-) > > This had been debated several times on debian-devel, see eg. > http://lists.debia

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Pierre Machard
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:52:31PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:47:12AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > But you might debate that point,with the debian person who filed a bug > > > suggesting that I needed to do it with debconf in the first place ;-) > > > > This had b

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:52:31PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > > In theory, the "note" should only be displayed by debconf if the user was > > upgrading from one of the really old versions. > > So if there is no need for the note, i

Re: Developer.php performance (+patch)

2004-02-18 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor Tags: patch On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:29:56PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Hi, > > developer.php is quite slow sometimes, especially on people with much > packages, you can notice delays, it even timeouts sometimes. Thanks to Martin Michlmayr, I w

Notification (Replaced with text)

2004-02-18 Thread virus-protection
* eManager Notification ** Attached files with executable extension have been deleted. (i.e. *.exe). Ausführbare Attachments wurden gelöscht (z.B. *.exe) Source mailbox: "" Destination mailbox(es): "debian-qa@lists.debian.org" Policy: Replaced with text Attachment file na

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:49:43AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:24:03AM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:52:31PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > > > In theory, the "note" should only be displayed by debconf if the user was > > > upgrading from one

[clebars@debian.org: Re: Your Debian package]

2004-02-18 Thread Pierre Machard
Hi, I am forwarding Christophe's answer Cheers, -- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87 --- Begin Message --- Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:16:57PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:11:16PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > ..., or if he does not remember this note when he launches his package > > two weeks later, in all these cases, user won't have a second chance, > > this information is

Re: Bug#169979: kdrill package in a very bad shape

2004-02-18 Thread Philip Brown
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 09:11:16PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > ..., or if he does not remember this note when he launches his package > two weeks later, in all these cases, user won't have a second chance, > this information is no more available. good point. Okay, I'll add it to the README at so

深圳市盛凯进出口贸易有限公司

2004-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
贵公司(厂)您好! 本公司属国家直接管理的一个大型企业,专业受理进出口报关业务。目前公司收集了大量多种货物成品、原料进出口代理报关,如果三资企业、内资 企业有办理海关来料加工进出免税手册 因各种原因进出口数量不符,本公司可以提供符合货物进出核销,达到货物合法免税。 本公司可以代开<出口专用发票>,本人朋友公司可以代开增值税电脑版发票、地税发票,可以代寻其它行业发票如运输、建筑、机动车.. 在深圳市各大口岸都设有专业代理机构,本公司根据中华人民共和国海关管理条例,务必通过合法正当手续办理出口货物。 本公司提供出口货物