I've tried to contact him because of old dailystrips packages, but no
reply in more or less one year...
Probably other packages are not maintained too...
>From devel/people:
Weber, Rene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
main: dailystrips, parchive, scanssh, swatch, txt2pdbdoc
non-free:
Title: Untitled Document
AUCTION
ON INSTRUCTIONS OF R F BROOKES (FOXHILL FOODS LTD) 10th March
2004 10.30am
The
Wern Industrial Estate.
There are a few obsolete kernels/patches of 2.6, such as (i386 only):
kernel-doc-2.6.0-test11 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version
2.6.0-test11.
kernel-doc-2.6.0-test9 - Linux kernel specific documentation for version
2.6.0-test9.
kernel-headers-2.6.0-test11-1 - Header files related
reassign 188176 ftp.debian.org
retitle 188176 Please remove quickppp
thanks
* Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-08 14:16]:
> > >I once intended to take over this package, but after discussions, it
> > >appears that the best solution would probably to remove this package
> > >from the arc
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:51:26AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> The following patches apply to test kernels, they probably need updates for a
> current one.
>
> kernel-patch-evms - Enterprise Volume Management System (kernel patches)
The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was upda
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, you wrote:
The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago.
Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian yet.
Which is fine, since 2.6.2 is out :)
Mike Stone
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:48:24AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, you wrote:
>> The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time
>> ago.
>> Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian
>> yet.
>
> Which is
Hi Andree & Hugo,
I'm a Debian quality assurance person and I noticed you commenting on
some of mondo's bug in our Bug Tracking System recently. There were
some license problems with our mindi-kernel package because it
contained pre-compiled kernel modules without any source code. This
might jus
Hi Andree & Hugo,
I'm a Debian quality assurance person and I noticed you commenting on
some of mondo's bug in our Bug Tracking System recently. There were
some license problems with our mindi-kernel package because it
contained pre-compiled kernel modules without any source code. This
might jus
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago.
> Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in Debian yet.
>
Good point: security. We have a lots of dangerous pre-2.4.24 kernels
a
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 07:47:10PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:37:30AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > The description lies; kernel-patch-evms was updated for 2.6.0 some time ago.
> > Of course, 2.6.0 has known security problems, and 2.6.1 isn't in De
Martin Michlmayr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-
> I'm a Debian quality assurance person and I noticed you commenting on
> some of mondo's bug in our Bug Tracking System recently. There were
> some license problems with our mindi-kernel package because it
> contained pre-compiled kernel modules
(Sorry if you got this email twice. My mail from yesterday vanished
somehow, maybe it still appears on the list in some days).
Hi QA!
Some weeks ago I separated some auxillary postgresql packages out of
the main source tree into separate proper source packages, among them
pgperl.
pgperl is the o
13 matches
Mail list logo
