On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 10:36:35AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> It shows no such thing. It indicates that the maintainer doesn't want to
> package the new version for some reason.
exactly. and if a maintainer doesn't want to package the new version of
one or two of is packages for a while it migh
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:30:22AM +0100, you wrote:
and it takes a maximum of two minutes per package to create a watch
file, so why not?
Because I don't see a point. Because I've seen a lot of clever little
ideas for things to add to packages come and go. If a developer decides
he wants this,
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 06:33:25AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> Because I don't see a point. Because I've seen a lot of clever little
> ideas for things to add to packages come and go. If a developer decides
> he wants this, fine. But the idea of filing a mass bug to tell everyone
> they should do
Hi all,
The airstrike package has been packaged by Sven Velt, and sponsored by
Norbert Tretkowski, so I put them on CC:.
I submited several bug reports on the airstrike package, see
http://bugs.debian.org/airstrike (my two last bug reports are not on the
bts, just sent them, the three others are
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:04:44PM +0100, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> The main issues with the package, beside the fact it is unuseable with
> an non-english keyboard and undocumented,
It works fine for me (finnish keyboard) and the keyboard setup seems
to document playing the game rather well. It's
Quoting Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It works fine for me (finnish keyboard) and the keyboard setup seems
> to document playing the game rather well. It's no nethack..
Does the finish keyboard have numbers with or without shift pressed ? French
keyboards needs to press shift for numbers. The
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> would you like wishlist bugs more if every bug had a working watch file
> attached?
I see no reason to reject working watch files, but I do not share
your opinion of preparing watch files in maximum two minutes. The
fact that it more than three times to
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 05:23:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I see no reason to reject working watch files, but I do not share
> your opinion of preparing watch files in maximum two minutes. The
> fact that it more than three times took me more than 10 minutes
> is the reason that I have given
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:31:14PM +0100, you wrote:
would you like wishlist bugs more if every bug had a working watch file
attached?
No, what would make you think that would be a good idea?
Mike Stone
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:17:59AM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
> No, what would make you think that would be a good idea?
well, a mass-filing of bugs doesn't improve anything, patches do.
cu robert
--
Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
signature.asc
Descri
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 221209 qa.debian.org
Bug#221209: Please remove swig and swig-doc
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Mindi depends on mindi-kernel, which had to be removed for license reasons.
(See bug 227757.) QA, what do you think of removing mindi from unstable
as well? It seems correct to me. (In that case, please have someone James
Troup recognizes file a bug against ftp.debian.org.) Or should it
just be
Your Privacy is extremely important to us. You are receiving this because you
previously subscribed to receive third-party 0ffers at one of our partners' web
sites. If you feel you have received this message in error, or if you wish to
unsubscribe, please see below.
Use the link below to un-sub
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 07:56:32PM -0500, DOF wrote:
> Your Privacy is extremely important to us. You are receiving this because you
> previously subscribed to receive third-party 0ffers at one of our partners'
> web sites. If you feel you have received this message in error, or if you
> wish to
14 matches
Mail list logo
