Re: Restoring qa.d.o

Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > to propose the following: > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed it in > /org/home/weasel/possibly-compromised-copy-of-qa.

"The maintainer has returned"

Timshel Knoll wrote: I have been MIA for some time but am back ... I've had a very crazy few months organising a wedding, during which time I moved and due to telecommunication company issues lost my internet connection :-(. But it's all back to normal now. Hooray! :-) :-) :-) Gnomba has been

Re: Restoring qa.d.o

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 03:36:45AM +0100, Peter Palfrader écrivait: > > To make absolutely certain that we did not forget anything, I would like > > to propose the following: > > > > > > I have made a copy of /org/qa.debian.org on klecker and placed

Next round of ITA checking

Hi. Small announcement to avoid doubled work: In August and September I was going through the list of ITA bugs to identify leftover ones. I checked all ITA bugs older than six months, closed around 10 where packages were already uploaded and retitled around 10 back. Two were reassigned to ftp.de

Re: Old, ignored RC bugs revisited

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:51:02PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > * request-tracker: Remove from testing and unstable, in keeping with > discussion on this list. (#191165) Any objections? Otherwise I will reassign the ITA #196200 to ftp.debian.org. See also the discussion in this bug. This pa