On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:22:11AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> request tracker has several important and grave bugs - open for over
> half a year. If I trust John Goerzen in #191165 the "Command-line
> utilities totally inoperable as shipped".
>
> Maybe we should remove request tracker?
Does
* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-18 06:22]:
> request tracker has several important and grave bugs - open for over
> half a year. If I trust John Goerzen in #191165 the "Command-line
> utilities totally inoperable as shipped".
>
> Maybe we should remove request tracker?
jaq and dop
This one time, at band camp, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>* Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-18 06:22]:
>> request tracker has several important and grave bugs - open for over
>> half a year. If I trust John Goerzen in #191165 the "Command-line
>> utilities totally inoperable as shipped".
* Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-13 22:49]:
> I would like to request that libpqxx be orphaned. I am making a lot
> of use of libpqxx at the moment (hence my interest in it), so I would
> be willing to adopt the package unless there are any objections
> against that.
Go ahead.
--
Marti
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-13 22:49]:
>> I would like to request that libpqxx be orphaned. I am making a lot
>> of use of libpqxx at the moment (hence my interest in it), so I would
>> be willing to adopt the package unless there are
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:22:11AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > request tracker has several important and grave bugs - open for over
> > half a year. If I trust John Goerzen in #191165 the "Command-line
> > utilities totally inoperable as shipped"
Hi,
libfltk1 is orphaned, is in oldlibs, and only one package still depends
on it (if I'm not mistaken).
Juan, any chance you can rebuild pose against fltk1.1 in the near future
so fltk is not needed at all anymore?
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messag
I just visited http://qa.debian.org/> looking for info on how to
report a debian developer that I suspect is missing in action.
Looking at the plan package, I starting to suspect that the maintainer
Gopal Narayanan is missing in action. If I remember correctly, the QA
team is the group that want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Martes, 18 de Noviembre de 2003 17:40, escribió:
> Hi,
Hi.
> libfltk1 is orphaned, is in oldlibs, and only one package still depends
> on it (if I'm not mistaken).
>
> Juan, any chance you can rebuild pose against fltk1.1 in the near future
> so f
Hi,
I've been working though the list[1] of orphaned packages with the
maintainer still set to the old maintainer, and I've arrived at cpanel.
I notice that there has been a sponsored upload made recently[2]
I just wanted to know if this package was indeed orphaned? If so, I'll
make an upload
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:47:53PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 06:22:11AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > Maybe we should remove request tracker?
> >
> > Does it have a sensible upgrade path to request-tracker-3?
>
> W
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-19 07:35]:
> I notice that there has been a sponsored upload made recently[2]
>
> I just wanted to know if this package was indeed orphaned? If so, I'll
> make an upload with the maintainer set to the QA group, otherwise, could
> you please close bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
