Bug#194660: marked as done (developer.php: wrong blue colorization (description))

Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:25:28 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#202994: marked as done (developer.php: lists obsolete priorities)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:27:29 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#194659: marked as done (developer.php: wrong buildd link for users with dotted uid)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:18:57 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#201531: marked as done (developer.php: please make "no bugs" active)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:31:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

Bug#204548: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Excuse list could be read as presonal attack)

Your message dated Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:29:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Close this bug has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re

About requests for co-maintainers

Hi, Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found this information ... and did not found it. Some maintainers use the PTS to advertise this ... but you have to check the package on the PTS

Re: About requests for co-maintainers

On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 02:17:36AM +0200, Raphael Goulais wrote: > Reading the thread about nm process on debian devel, I learned the mutt > maintainer was willing to co-maintain mutt. I wondered how I could have found > this information ... and did not found it. > > Some maintainers use the PT