Hi,
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:09:27PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The most common way to get the library dependencies (also used in cccd) if
> you link with libgtk is to use the output of "gtk-config --libs". You do
> link directly with the other libraries then but it's libgtk1.2-dev's job
> to e
Estimada
empresa,
Le
presentamos el software profesional para el comercio
electrónico
i
p e r 1
es
la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en
in
Estimada empresa,
Le presentamos el software profesional para el comercio electrónico
i p e r 1
es la solución mejor para abrir una tienda en internet,
es un programa completo, potente y al mismo tiempo simple y fácil en
su utilización y navegacion.
Es Perfecto: para la venta al por menor
Hi,
over one month ago I suggested the following:
<-- snip -->
Currently QA works the way that people find something to do themselves and
everyone works for himself at the tasks he sees. I propose to change this
to define tasks of QA work with usually 2-3 people responsible for each
area. The
On 3 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Ok, I've gone through all the ITAs on the wnpp list and used Adrian's
> algorithm.
>
> Two more wnpp maintenance questions:
>
> 1) There are a metric ton of ITPs. *Something* should be done. But I
>don't know what.
>...
I did sometimes start to
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:43:54PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The main problem is that it's very much work if every six months a person
> comes and tries to go through the WNPP bugs. That's something I hope it
> will become with my proposal of testing tasks - there are people
> responsible for WN
Le Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:00:15PM +0100, Adrian Bunk écrivait:
> everyone works for himself at the tasks he sees. I propose to change this
> to define tasks of QA work with usually 2-3 people responsible for each
> area. These people responsible can do the work either themselves or by
> organizin
7 matches
Mail list logo
