Hello everybody,
the QA group will soon provide a new service[1]. The ability to subscribe
to packages : when you're subscribed to a package you get all
the BTS mails that the maintainer is getting.
How does it work ?
You can (un)subscribe to a package by sending a mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello everybody,
[snippage]
>
> * Anything else ? Please tell me ... :)
* It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
in.
>
[more snippage]
>
> Now, your feedback is welcome. I also accept volunteers who
Hello list!
[please CC me, I tried to subscribe but didn't get a confirm
mail yet]
a friend told me that the gnu-smalltalk was too old on unstable,
I went to check this out and found out that its maintainer is
MIA since Oct 2000 and decided to do some QA on the package...
I have an NMU ready, wi
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the
> package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no
> libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86
> the file is in libmicrowindow
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the
> package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no
> libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86
> the file is in libmicrowindow
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> (opt-in) maintainers about such problems).
R
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (I rarely do these
> > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and
> > logs).
>
> This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
> responsible
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> What do you mean by "the build report"? Do you mean bug report
> 121459?
The bug, sorry.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
pgpO8RwoFItnm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src'
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src/apps'
make[3]: Entering directory
`/build/buildd/mi
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:32:30 +0100
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Easy :
> - you get some information about the maintainer (you see if he has many
> outstanding bugs, how old the bugs are, you check the last seen
> field on db.debian.org (you need to authenticate to get the info))
> > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies
> > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all.
>
> As far as I can tell, it doesn't work:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&stamp=1010178840&file=log&as=raw
The
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:21:45AM +, Adam Olsen écrivait:
> * It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
> in.
I'm not sure that it's really fun to watch. However, yes of course if
they wish. But we shouldn't explicitely advertise it to our users, they
may learn it th
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020105 15:16]:
> the QA group will soon provide a new service[1]. The ability to
> subscribe to packages
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm really glad that this is possible now. However, I wonder if this
should really be hosted at packages.qa.d.o. Why cannot it be
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 05:30:36AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait:
> a friend told me that the gnu-smalltalk was too old on unstable,
> I went to check this out and found out that its maintainer is
> MIA since Oct 2000 and decided to do some QA on the package...
>
> I have an NMU ready, wic
On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 18:47, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
> responsible for checking build status and logs [...]
Which is kind of silly, given how easy it is to go to
http://buildd.debian.org and look up build logs for a package.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > (I rarely do these
> > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and
> > > logs).
I concur with Dan here - part because it's really his job, part because
I've had it with filing bug reports from m68k buildds myself. But there's
always two sides to that issue, so:
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> > every maintainer to do a few extra steps
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 10:21:45AM +, Adam Olsen ?crivait:
> > * It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
> > in.
>
> I'm not sure that it's really fun to watch. However, yes of course if
> they wish.
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> (opt-in) maintainers about
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). The port maintainers
>
> Such as the pack
* Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020106 13:04]:
> > - you mail mia-@qa.debian.org
> I knew about this, but I thought only qa people should send mails
> there
Raphael has done it already so there's no need to do it again.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:42:18AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
hi
> I'd appreciate if someone could adjust the patch in #115625 to work with our
> version of reformime in the stable maildrop package.
i'v been lurking at the src and it seems to me that the DoS is not
effective against reform
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 12:01:17PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait:
> I'm really glad that this is possible now. However, I wonder if this
> should really be hosted at packages.qa.d.o. Why cannot it be
> integrated with the normal [EMAIL PROTECTED] bot? After all, this is a
> bugs issue. I'm a
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2002-01-04 at 18:47, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not
> > responsible for checking build status and logs [...]
>
> Which is kind of silly, given how easy it is to go to
> http://buildd.
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the
> microwindows build tries to use that before it's built.
No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build
libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving m
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:42:41PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving me a log of
> the actual failure (which will require dropping that silly redirection
> from debian/rules), you're just guessing.
Sent by private mail.
--
"You grabbe
26 matches
Mail list logo
