Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-16 Thread Anthony Towns
I'm not sure why everyone's Cc'ing me on this thread. On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 01:50:01PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > What about people like myself who are stuck with crappy bits of > > software like trn which have lots of bugs which are unlikely to be > > fixed any time soon? It seems like my e

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-16 Thread Philip Blundell
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" writes: >On 16-Dec-2001 Adam Di Carlo wrote: >> The i18n builds do include Japanese support. Is that what you were >> asking about? > >en pt de pl fr es ja sv it hu > >no jp there Right. The ISO-639 language code for Japanese is "ja". p.

Bug#124193: mpg123: docs should be in /usr/share/doc

2001-12-16 Thread Sam Clegg
Package: mpg123 Version: 0.59q-2 Severity: normal most other packages use /usr/share/doc. mpg123 still uses /usr/doc. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux magicboy 2.4.17-pre8 #1 Tue Dec 11 13:40:23 GMT 2001 i686 unknown Versions of the packages mpg123 depends on: ii

Bug#124193: mpg123: docs should be in /usr/share/doc

2001-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
tags 124193 woody thanks On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 01:05:25PM +, Sam Clegg wrote: > Package: mpg123 > Version: 0.59q-2 > Severity: normal > > most other packages use /usr/share/doc. > mpg123 still uses /usr/doc. This bug does not exist in the version of mpg123 currently in unstable, and will g

Processed: Re: Bug#124193: mpg123: docs should be in /usr/share/doc

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 124193 woody Bug#124193: mpg123: docs should be in /usr/share/doc Tags added: woody > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Re: 3.0.18 testing needed

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 08:37:11PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > >> en pt de pl fr es ja sv it hu > >> > >> no jp there > > > > What do you think ja is ? > > java? dunno Think "Japan" and "Japanese"... -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: Low Averge Bug Counts

2001-12-16 Thread Grant Bowman
* Anthony Towns [011215 23:26]: > I'm not sure why everyone's Cc'ing me on this thread. Sorry, I won't Cc you anymore. Heh. > On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 01:50:01PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote: > > > What about people like myself who are stuck with crappy bits of > > > software like trn which have lo

kdoc_2.0a53-7_i386.changes INSTALLED

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: kdoc_2.0a53-7.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a53-7.diff.gz kdoc_2.0a53-7.dsc to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a53-7.dsc kdoc_2.0a53-7_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdoc/kdoc_2.0a53-7_all.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: Thank you for your contribu

ssh2_2.0.13-7_i386+sparc.changes INSTALLED

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Installer
Installing: ssh2_2.0.13-7.diff.gz to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2_2.0.13-7.diff.gz ssh2_2.0.13-7.dsc to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2_2.0.13-7.dsc ssh2_2.0.13-7_i386.deb to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2_2.0.13-7_i386.deb ssh2_2.0.13-7_sparc.deb to pool/non-US/non-free/s/ssh2/ssh2

ssh2 override disparity

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): ssh2_2.0.13-7_sparc.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. ssh2_2.0.13-7_i386.deb: priority is overridden from optional to extra. Either the package or the override file is i

Bug#75008: marked as done (ssh2: -i is always relative to $HOME/.ssh2)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:53:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#75008: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#38921: marked as done (ssh2: should use alternatives)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:53:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#38895: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#51993: marked as done (ssh2: fails to configure -- does not stop daemon before restarting)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:53:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#51993: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#58855: marked as done (ssh2: ssh2 should be configured with correct Sshd1Path)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:53:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#58855: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#38895: marked as done (ssh overwrites ssh2 symlinks)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:53:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#38895: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#60912: marked as done (ssh2: port-configuration has to be done two times)

2001-12-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:53:21 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#60912: fixed in ssh2 2.0.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Moving packages@qa.debian.org

2001-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
Hi, I'm told that debian-qa-packages has now been created. Could [EMAIL PROTECTED] be pointed at that list instead of debian-qa, please? Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#123303: kyahoo: ";0,0 0" appended to things written in a chat

2001-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:02:07PM +, Aquarius wrote: > KYahoo seems to be appending the string ";0,00" to things other > chatters type. See transcript excerpt below. Could you try it with debugging messages turned on (Yahoo / Debug Messages)? I'd try myself, but it wants me to do registratio

[광고] ★ 부동산 정보의 오아시스

2001-12-16 Thread 한석봉
Title: ::: 지역별 추천 공인중개사 모집 :::

kde-i18n

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I was wondering, how come there isn't a kde-i18n-* package for all available languages? I know that there are quite a bit of KDE translations for "hr", but there's no package for it that I can see... Not that I would use it :) but I have some clients that could be wondering about it. --

Re: Moving packages@qa.debian.org

2001-12-16 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 09:30:46PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > I'm told that debian-qa-packages has now been created. Could > [EMAIL PROTECTED] be pointed at that list instead of debian-qa, > please? I assume we have a consensus on this? (Have to check.) -- 2. That which causes joy or hap

Re: Moving packages@qa.debian.org

2001-12-16 Thread Grant Bowman
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011216 14:49]: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 09:30:46PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm told that debian-qa-packages has now been created. Could > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] be pointed at that list instead of debian-qa, > > please? > > I assume we have a consensus on thi

Re: kde-i18n

2001-12-16 Thread Ivan E. Moore II
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:41:47PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering, how come there isn't a kde-i18n-* package for all available > languages? I know that there are quite a bit of KDE translations for "hr", > but there's no package for it that I can see... > > Not that I would u

Re: Moving packages@qa.debian.org

2001-12-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 11:51:36PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 09:30:46PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm told that debian-qa-packages has now been created. Could > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] be pointed at that list instead of debian-qa, > > please? > > I assume we have a conse

Bug#124289: korelib: Build failure with gcc 3.0 (hppa)

2001-12-16 Thread LaMont Jones
Package: korelib Version: 0.0.1-7 Severity: important Tags: patch Build fails on hppa because of gcc 3.0 errors. The patch below fixes the problem. Since this package is a build-dependency of another package, and the fix is trivial, I will probably upload a source NMU within the next few days.